bioRxivPathologyPreprint
Improving the diagnosis and classification of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms through deep phenotyping
K. Sirinukunwattana, A. Aberdeen, H. Theissen, N. Sousos, B. Psaila, A. Mead, G. Turner, G. Rees, J. Rittscher, D. Royston
Abstract
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders characterized by excessive proliferation of myeloid lineages. Accurate classification and appropriate management of MPNs requires integration of clinical, morphological and genetic findings. Despite major advances in understanding the molecular and genetic basis, morphological assessment of the bone marrow trephine (BMT) remains paramount in differentiating between MPN subtypes and reactive conditions. However, morphological assessment is heavily constrained by a reliance on subjective, qualitative and poorly reproducible criteria. To address this, we have developed a machine-learning strategy for the automated identification and quantitative analysis of megakaryocyte morphology using clinical BMT samples. Using a sample cohort of recently diagnosed or established ET (n = 48) and reactive control cases (n = 42) we demonstrated a high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.95) of automated tissue ET diagnosis based upon these specific megakaryocyte phenotypes. These separate morphological phenotypes showed evidence of specific genotype associations, which offers promise that an automated cell phenotyping approach may be of clinical diagnostic utility as an adjunct to standard genetic and molecular tests. This has great potential to assist in the routine assessment of newly diagnosed or suspected MPN patients and those undergoing treatment / clinical follow-up. The extraction of quantitative morphological data from BMT sections will also have value in the assessment of new therapeutic strategies directed towards the bone marrow microenvironment and can provide clinicians and researchers with objective, quantitative data without significant demands upon current routine specimen workflows.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Megakaryocytic proteomic signatures define myeloproliferative neoplasms
Indu Raman, Cavan Bennett, … Sukhdeep Spall·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2026
- Plasma proteome screen of individuals with elevated blood counts to identify diagnostic signatures and biomarkers inherent to patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms
Xiangfu Zhong, Ingrid E. J. Lundahl, … Johanna S. Ungerstedt·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026
- Platelet transcriptome yields progressive markers in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms and identifies putative targets of therapy
Zhu Shen, Wenfei Du, … Anandi Krishnan·BloodPeer-reviewed·Nov 5, 2021
- Circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in myeloproliferative neoplasms
Gal Dadi, Oren Milman, … Liran I. Shlush·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2026
- Melatonin nanoparticles inhibit mutant hematopoiesis and restore bone marrow architecture in myeloproliferative neoplasms
Siddharth Gupta, Alessandro Motta, … Nicolas Chatain·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2026
- Platelet proteo-transcriptomic profiling validates mediators of thrombosis and proteostasis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms
S. Kelliher, S. Gamba, … A. Krishnan·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2023