bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Centromere-associated retroelement evolution in Drosophila melanogaster reveals an underlying conflict
Lucas W. HemmeriD, Sherif Negm, Xuewen GengiD, Cécile CourretiD, Beatriz M. Navarro-DomíngueziD, Iain Speece, Xiaolu WeiiD, Eddyson Altidor, James ChafferiD, John S. SprouliD, Amanda M. LarracuenteiD
Abstract
Centromeres are chromosomal regions essential for coordinating chromosome segregation during cell division. While centromeres are defined by the presence of a centromere-specific histone H3 variant rather than a particular DNA sequence, they are typically embedded in repeat-dense chromosomal genome regions. In many species, centromeres are associated with transposable elements, but it is unclear if these elements are selfish or if they play a role in centromere specification or function. Here we use Drosophila melanogaster as a model to understand the evolution of centromere-associated transposable elements. G2/Jockey-3 is a non-LTR retroelement in the Jockey clade and the only sequence shared by all centromeres. We study the evolution of G2/Jockey-3 using short and long read population genomic data to infer insertion polymorphisms across the genome. We combine estimates of the age, frequency, and location of insertions to infer the evolutionary processes shaping G2/Jockey-3 and its association with the centromeres. We find that G2/Jockey-3 is an active retroelement targeted by the piRNA pathway that is enriched in centromeres at least in part due to an insertion bias. We do not detect signatures of positive selection on any G2/Jockey-3 insertions that would suggest than individual copies are favored by natural selection. Instead, we infer that most insertions are neutral or weakly deleterious both inside and outside of the centromeres. Therefore, G2/Jockey-3 evolution is consistent with it being a selfish genetic element that targets centromeres. We propose that targeting centromeres helps active retroelements escape host defenses, as the unique centromeric chromatin may prevent targeting by the host silencing machinery. At the same time, centromeric TEs insertions may be tolerated or even beneficial if they also contribute to the transcriptional and chromatin environment. Thus, we suspect centromere-associated retroelements like G2/Jockey-3 reflect a balance between conflict and cooperation at the centromeres.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Islands of retroelements are the major components of Drosophila centromeres
Ching-Ho Chang, Ankita Chavan, … Barbara G. Mellone·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 14, 2019
- Transcription of a centromere-enriched retroelement and local retention of its RNA are significant features of the CENP-A chromatin landscape
B. Santinello, R. Sun, … B. G. Mellone·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2024
- Turnover of retroelements and satellite DNA drives centromere reorganizationover short evolutionary timescales in Drosophila
C. Courret, L. Hemmer, … A. M. Larracuente·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2023
- Dynamic turnover of centromeres drives karyotype evolution in Drosophila
R. Bracewell, K. Chatla, … D. Bachtrog·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2019
- Diversification and collapse of a telomere elongation mechanism
B. Saint-Leandre, S. C. Nguyen, M. Levine·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2018
- Convergence and conflict among telomere specialized transposons across 60 million years of Drosophilid evolution
Jae Hak Son, Matthew A. Lawlor, … Christopher E. Ellison·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026