bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Estimating the fitness effect of deleterious mutations during the two phases of the life cycle: a new method applied to the root-rot fungus Heterobasidion parviporum
P.-H. Clergeot, N. Rode, S. Glemin, M. Brandstroem-Durling, K. Ihrmark, A. Olson
Abstract
Many eukaryote species including taxa such as fungi or algae have a lifecycle with substantial haploid and diploid phases. A recent theoretical model predicts that such haploid-diploid lifecycles are stable over long evolutionary time scales when segregating deleterious mutations have stronger effects in homozygous diploids than in haploids and when they are partially recessive in heterozygous diploids. The model predicts that effective dominance, a measure that accounts for these two effects, should be close to 0.5 in these species. It also predicts that diploids should have higher fitness than haploids on average. However, an appropriate statistical framework to conjointly investigate these predictions is currently lacking. In this study, we derive a new quantitative genetic model to test these predictions using fitness data of two haploid parents and their diploid offspring and genome-wide genetic distance between haploid parents. We apply this model to the root-rot basidiomycete fungus Heterobasidion parviporum, a species where the heterokaryotic (equivalent to the diploid) phase is longer than the homokaryotic (haploid) phase. We measured two fitness-related traits (mycelium growth rate and the ability to degrade wood) in both homokaryons and heterokaryons and we used whole-genome sequencing to estimate nuclear genetic distance between parents. Possibly due to a lack of power, we did not find that deleterious mutations were recessive or more deleterious when expressed during the heterokaryotic phase. Using this model to compare effective dominance among haploid-diploid species where the relative importance of the two phases varies should help better understand the evolution of haploid-diploid life cycles.\n\nArticle summary for Issue HighlightsMany eukaryote species including taxa such as fungi or algae spend a large portion of their life cycle as haploids and as diploids. Clergeot, Rode et al. derive a statistical model to test whether deleterious mutations have stronger effects in homozygous diploids than in haploids, whether they are partially recessive in heterozygous diploids and whether diploids have higher fitness than haploids on average. As an illustration, they use their model to study growth rate and the ability to degrade wood in the root-rot fungus Heterobasidion parviporum. Their model should help gaining further insights into the evolution of haploid-diploid life cycles.
- organism: fungi (other)
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Fixation and effective size in a haploid-diploid population with asexual reproduction
Kazuhiro Bessho, Sarah Perin Otto·Theoretical Population BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2021
- Low spontaneous mutation rate in a complex multicellular eukaryote with a haploid-diploid life cycle
M. Krasovec, A. P. Lipinska, S. M. Coelho·bioRxiv·May 13, 2022
- Living apart together: modelling the consequences of the dikaryotic life cycle of mushroom-forming fungi for genomic conflict
B. Auxier, T. Czaran, D. K. Aanen·bioRxiv·May 28, 2020
- Restricted access to beneficial mutations slows adaptation and biases fixed mutations in diploids
D. A. Marad, G. I. Lang·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2017
- Sheltered load in fungal mating-type chromosomes revealed by fitness experiments
Lou Guyot, Elizabeth Chahine, … Tatiana Giraud·Journal of Evolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2025
- Inferring the distributions of fitness effects and proportions of strongly deleterious mutations
Anders Poulsen Charmouh, Greta Bocedi, Matthew Hartfield·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2023