bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
The rules of sex and strain: deciphering the chemical language of inbred and wild mouse conspecific scents
Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj, Rohini Bansal, David FleckiD, Angelika LampertiD, Romana StopkováiD, Pavel StopkaiD, Yoram Ben‐ShauliD, Marc SpehriD
Abstract
In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex- / strain-selective "raw" chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animals sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary secretome, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.
- organism: mouse
- assay: metagenomics
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Representation of male features in the female mouse Accessory Olfactory Bulb, and their stability during the estrus cycle
Oksana Cohen, Yoram Ben‐Shaul·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2025
- Sex separation unveils the functional plasticity of the vomeronasal organ in rabbits
Paula R. Villamayor, Julián Gullón, … Diego Robledo·Frontiers in Molecular NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2022
- Reproductive state switches the valence of male urinary pheromones in female mice
C. H. Miller, T. M. Reichard, … M. J. Sheehan·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2022
- Patterns of urine scent mark pheromone evolution in house mice and relatives (Muridae: Mus)
M. Sheehan, P. Campbell, C. H. Miller·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2019
- Perioral secretions enable complex social signaling in African mole-rats (genus Fukomys)
K. R. Caspar, P. Stopka, … S. Begall·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2022
- The nasopalatine ducts of the mouse conserve a functional role in pheromone signaling
Dana Rubi Levy, Yizhak Sofer, … Tali Kimchi·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2020