medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
The benefit of a complete reference genome for cancer structural variant analysis
Luis F. PauliniD, Jeremy Fan, Kieran O’NeilliD, Erin PleasanceiD, Vanessa PorteriD, Steven J.M. JonesiD, Fritz Joachim SedlazeckiD
Abstract
The complexities of cancer genomes are becoming more easily interpreted due to advancements in sequencing technologies and improved bioinformatic analysis. Structural variants (SVs) represent an important subset of somatic events in tumors. While detection of SVs has been markedly improved by the development of long-read sequencing, somatic variant identification and annotation remains challenging. We hypothesized that use of a completed human reference genome (CHM13-T2T) would improve somatic SV calling. Our findings in a tumour/normal matched benchmark sample and two patient samples show that the CHM13-T2T improves SV detection and prioritization accuracy compared to GRCh38, with a notable reduction in false positive calls. We also overcame the lack of annotation resources for CHM13-T2T by lifting over CHM13-T2T-aligned reads to the GRCh38 genome, therefore combining both improved alignment and advanced annotations. In this process, we assessed the current SV benchmark set for COLO829/COLO829BL across four replicates sequenced at different centers with different long-read technologies. We discovered instability of this cell line across these replicates; 346 SVs (1.13%) were only discoverable in a single replicate. We identify 49 somatic SVs, which appear to be stable as they are consistently present across the four replicates. As such, we propose this consensus set as an updated benchmark for somatic SV calling and include both GRCh38 and CHM13-T2T coordinates in our benchmark. The benchmark is available at: 10.5281/zenodo.10819636 Our work demonstrates new approaches to optimize somatic SV prioritization in cancer with potential improvements in other genetic diseases.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Somatic Structural Variant Discovery from Tumor Specific Strings Computed Against a Draft Composite Germline Reference
Davide Cesare Monti, Simone Ciccolella, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026
- A multi-platform reference for somatic structural variation detection
Jose Espejo Valle-Inclán, Nicolle J.M. Besselink, … Edwin P. J. G. Cuppen·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Anyone can be the best: Impact of diverse methodologies on the evaluation of structural variant callers
Luca Denti, Thomas Krannich, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2025
- Diploid donor-specific assembly enhances somatic structural variant detection in cancer genomes
Yuwei Zhang, Han Qu, … Peter J. Park·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2025
- Donor-specific assemblies enhance somatic structural variant detection in complex genomic regions
Taralynn Mack, Jiadong Lin, … Evan E. Eichler·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2026
- Accurate identification of structural variations from cancer samples
Le Li, Chenyang Hong, … Kevin Yuk-Lap Yip·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2023