A multi-platform reference for somatic structural variation detection
Jose Espejo Valle-InclániD, Nicolle J.M. BesselinkiD, Ewart de BruijniD, Daniel CameroniD, Jana EbleriD, Joachim KutzeraiD, Stef van Lieshout, Tobias MarschalliD, Marcel R. NeleniD, Andy Wing Chun PangiD, Peter PriestleyiD, Ivo Renkens, Margaretha G.M. RoemeriD, Markus J. van RoosmaleniD, Aaron M. WengeriD, Bauke YlstraiD, Remond J.A. FijnemaniD, Wigard P. KloostermaniD, Edwin P. J. G. CuppeniD
Abstract
Accurate detection of somatic structural variation (SV) in cancer genomes remains a challenging problem. This is in part due to the lack of high-quality gold standard datasets that enable the benchmarking of experimental approaches and bioinformatic analysis pipelines for comprehensive somatic SV detection. Here, we approached this challenge by genome-wide somatic SV analysis of the paired melanoma and normal lymphoblastoid COLO829 cell lines using four different technologies: Illumina HiSeq, Oxford Nanopore, Pacific Biosciences and 10x Genomics. Based on the evidence from multiple technologies combined with extensive experimental validation, including Bionano optical mapping data and targeted detection of candidate breakpoint junctions, we compiled a comprehensive set of true somatic SVs, comprising all SV types. We demonstrate the utility of this resource by determining the SV detection performance of each technology as a function of tumor purity and sequence depth, highlighting the importance of assessing these parameters in cancer genomics projects and data analysis tool evaluation. The reference truth somatic SV dataset as well as the underlying raw multi-platform sequencing data are freely available and are an important resource for community somatic benchmarking efforts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 51
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The benefit of a complete reference genome for cancer structural variant analysis
Luis F. Paulin, Jeremy Fan, … Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck·medRxiv·Mar 15, 2024
- Comprehensive benchmarking of somatic structural variant detection at ultra-low allele fractions
Yuwei Zhang, Adam C. English, … Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2025
- Somatic Structural Variant Discovery from Tumor Specific Strings Computed Against a Draft Composite Germline Reference
Davide Cesare Monti, Simone Ciccolella, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026
- Donor-specific assemblies enhance somatic structural variant detection in complex genomic regions
Taralynn Mack, Jiadong Lin, … Evan E. Eichler·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2026
- Cost-effective hybrid long- and short-read sequencing enables accurate somatic structural variant detection
Runtian Gao, Tao Jiang, … Guohua Wang·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2026
- SAVANA: reliable analysis of somatic structural variants and copy number aberrations in clinical samples using long-read sequencing
Hillary Elrick, Carolin M. Sauer, … Isidro Cortés‐Ciriano·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2025