bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Donor-specific assemblies enhance somatic structural variant detection in complex genomic regions
Taralynn MackiD, Jiadong LiniD, Luyao ReniD, Min-Hwan SohniD, Anna MinkinaiD, Youngjun KwoniD, DongAhn YooiD, Yang SuiiD, Katherine M. MunsoniD, Kendra HoekzemaiD, Francesco Kumara MastrorosaiD, Melanie SorenseniD, Marcelo AylloniD, Kaitlyn A. SuniD, Nidhi Koundiya, Jeffrey OuiD, Michelle D. NoyesiD, Adriana Estela Sedeño-CortésiD, Amy S. LeonardsoniD, Caitlin N. JacquesiD, Chris Oliviera, Christian D. FrazariD, Christina ZakarianiD, Dana M. JenseniD, Elliot Swanson, , Evan E. EichleriD
Abstract
Structural variants (SVs) contribute substantially to genomic variation and disease, but detecting somatic SVs (sSVs) remains difficult due to reference bias, mosaicism, and enrichment in repetitive regions. Linear reference genomes, like GRCh38 and CHM13, do not fully capture individual genomic structure, which can obscure true somatic variation. Donor-specific assemblies (DSAs) generated from the same genome where sSVs are being assayed provide a personalized alternative, yet their performance for sSV detection has not been systematically assessed. As part of the Somatic Mosaicism across Human Tissues (SMaHT) Network, we benchmark a DSA for sSV discovery in the COLO829 melanoma cell line with a matched normal sample from the same individual. We compare sSV detection across GRCh38, CHM13, and the COLO829BL_DSA using three different sSV callers (Delly, Severus, and Sniffles2) and sequence data from multiple long-read platforms. The COLO829BL_DSA identifies 1.8-fold more manually validated sSVs than linear references, in regions both shared with GRCh38 and CHM13 and unique to the COLO829BL_DSA. Variants detected only with the COLO829BL_DSA are often found in satellite and other repeat-rich regions that are difficult to resolve using standard references. In addition, several COLO829BL_DSA-specific sSVs are located in genes, some of which are associated with cancer. Overall, these results underscore the utility of DSAs in improving sSV detection.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Diploid donor-specific assembly enhances somatic structural variant detection in cancer genomes
Yuwei Zhang, Han Qu, … Peter J. Park·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2025
- Somatic Structural Variant Discovery from Tumor Specific Strings Computed Against a Draft Composite Germline Reference
Davide Cesare Monti, Simone Ciccolella, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026
- The benefit of a complete reference genome for cancer structural variant analysis
Luis F. Paulin, Jeremy Fan, … Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck·medRxiv·Mar 15, 2024
- A multi-platform reference for somatic structural variation detection
Jose Espejo Valle-Inclán, Nicolle J.M. Besselink, … Edwin P. J. G. Cuppen·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Long-range somatic structural variation calling from matched tumor-normal co-assembly graphs
Megan K. Le, Qian Qin, Heng Li·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2024
- Comprehensive benchmarking of somatic structural variant detection at ultra-low allele fractions
Yuwei Zhang, Adam C. English, … Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2025