henhaobio
Sign in

Brain CommunicationsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Activity or Connectivity? Evaluating neurofeedback training in Huntington’s disease

Marina PapoutsiiD, Joerg MagerkurthiD, Oliver Josephs, Sophia E. PépésiD, Temi IbitoyeiD, Ralf ReilmanniD, Nigel Hunt, Edwin Payne, Nikolaus WeiskopfiD, Douglas R. LangbehniD, Geraint E. ReesiD, Sarah J. TabriziiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Non-invasive methods, such as neurofeedback training (NFT), could support cognitive symptom management in Huntingtons disease (HD) by targeting brain regions whose function is impaired. The aim of our single-blind, sham-controlled study was to collect rigorous evidence regarding the feasibility of NFT in HD by examining two different methods, activity and connectivity real-time fMRI NFT. Thirty-two HD gene-carriers completed 16 runs of NFT training, using an optimized real-time fMRI protocol. Participants were randomized into four groups, two treatment groups, one receiving neurofeedback derived from the activity of the Supplementary Motor Area (SMA), and another receiving neurofeedback based on the correlation of SMA and left striatum activity (connectivity NFT), and two sham control groups, matched to each of the treatment groups. We examined differences between the groups during NFT training sessions and after training at follow-up sessions. Transfer of training was measured by measuring the participants ability to upregulate NFT target levels without feedback (near transfer), as well as by examining change in objective, a-priori defined, behavioural measures of cognitive and psychomotor function (far transfer) before and at 2 months after training. We found that the treatment group had significantly higher NFT target levels during the training sessions compared to the control group. However, we did not find robust evidence of better transfer in the treatment group compared to controls, or a difference between the two NFT methods. We also did not find evidence in support of a relationship between change in cognitive and psychomotor function and NFT learning success. We conclude that although there is evidence that NFT can be used to guide participants to regulate the activity and connectivity of specific regions in the brain, evidence regarding transfer of learning and clinical benefit was not robust. Although the intervention is non-invasive, given the costs and absence of reliable evidence of clinical benefit, we cannot recommend real-time fMRI NFT as a potential intervention in HD.

Citations
22
FWCI
1.72
Field percentile
top 18%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFleury '24Haugg '20Grössinger '21Onagawa '23Bauer '25Demirtaş '25
68% semantic matchBioengineering
Mathis Fleury, Pauline Cloerec, Quentin Duché+2 more·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2024