Brain CommunicationsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Activity or Connectivity? Evaluating neurofeedback training in Huntington’s disease
Marina PapoutsiiD, Joerg MagerkurthiD, Oliver Josephs, Sophia E. PépésiD, Temi IbitoyeiD, Ralf ReilmanniD, Nigel Hunt, Edwin Payne, Nikolaus WeiskopfiD, Douglas R. LangbehniD, Geraint E. ReesiD, Sarah J. TabriziiD
Abstract
Non-invasive methods, such as neurofeedback training (NFT), could support cognitive symptom management in Huntingtons disease (HD) by targeting brain regions whose function is impaired. The aim of our single-blind, sham-controlled study was to collect rigorous evidence regarding the feasibility of NFT in HD by examining two different methods, activity and connectivity real-time fMRI NFT. Thirty-two HD gene-carriers completed 16 runs of NFT training, using an optimized real-time fMRI protocol. Participants were randomized into four groups, two treatment groups, one receiving neurofeedback derived from the activity of the Supplementary Motor Area (SMA), and another receiving neurofeedback based on the correlation of SMA and left striatum activity (connectivity NFT), and two sham control groups, matched to each of the treatment groups. We examined differences between the groups during NFT training sessions and after training at follow-up sessions. Transfer of training was measured by measuring the participants ability to upregulate NFT target levels without feedback (near transfer), as well as by examining change in objective, a-priori defined, behavioural measures of cognitive and psychomotor function (far transfer) before and at 2 months after training. We found that the treatment group had significantly higher NFT target levels during the training sessions compared to the control group. However, we did not find robust evidence of better transfer in the treatment group compared to controls, or a difference between the two NFT methods. We also did not find evidence in support of a relationship between change in cognitive and psychomotor function and NFT learning success. We conclude that although there is evidence that NFT can be used to guide participants to regulate the activity and connectivity of specific regions in the brain, evidence regarding transfer of learning and clinical benefit was not robust. Although the intervention is non-invasive, given the costs and absence of reliable evidence of clinical benefit, we cannot recommend real-time fMRI NFT as a potential intervention in HD.
- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Field percentile
- top 18%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Introducing Haptic Feedback in Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback: A Novel Approach to Modulate Primary Motor Cortex Activity
Mathis Fleury, Pauline Cloerec, … Anatole Lécuyer·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2024
- Can we predict real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pre-training brain activity?
Amelie Haugg, Ronald Sladky, … Frank Scharnowski·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2020
- The role of superstition of cognitive control during neurofeedback training
Doris Grössinger, Florian Ph. S. Fischmeister, … Guilherme Maia de Oliveira Wood·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2021
- Neurofeedback training for improving motor performance in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ryoji Onagawa, Yoshihito Muraoka, … Mitsuaki Takemi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2023
- Real-time fMRI neurofeedback modulates auditory cortex activity and connectivity in schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations: A controlled study
Clemens C. C. Bauer, Jiahe Zhang, … Margaret A. Niznikiewicz·Psychiatry Research NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2025
- Large Scale Functional and Effective Connectivity Alterations cross the Huntington's Disease Integrated Staging System
Murat Demirtaş, Dorian Pustina, … Gustavo Deco·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2025