Nature Human BehaviourEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Correlations between human mating partners: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 22 traits and raw data analysis of 133 traits in the UK Biobank
Tanya B. HorwitziD, Jared V. BalbonaiD, Katie N. PaulichiD, Matthew C. KelleriD
Abstract
Positive correlations between human mating partners are consistently observed across traits. Such correlations can increase phenotypic variation and, to the extent that they reflect genetic similarity in co-parents, can also increase prevalence for rare phenotypes and bias estimates in genetic designs. We conducted the largest set of meta-analyses on human partner correlations to date, incorporating 480 partner correlations across 22 traits. We also calculated 133 trait correlations between up to 79,074 male-female couples in the UK Biobank (UKB). Estimates of the mean meta-analyzed correlations ranged from rmeta=.08 for extraversion to rmeta=.58 for political values. UKB correlations ranged from rUKB=-.18 for chronotype to rUKB=.87 for birth year. Overall, attitudes, education, and substance use traits mostly showed the highest correlations, while psychological and biological traits generally yielded lower but still positive correlations. We observed high between-study heterogeneity for most meta-analyzed traits, likely because of both systematic differences between samples and true differences in partner correlations across populations.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 105
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlations: Cheveruds Conjecture in Humans
Sebastian M. Sodini, Kathryn E. Kemper, … Maciej Trzaskowski·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 8, 2018
- The contribution of mate-choice, couple convergence and confounding to assortative mating
Jennifer Sjaarda, Zoltán Kutalik·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2022
- Indirect assortative mating for human disease and longevity
Konrad Rawlik, Oriol Canela‐Xandri, Albert Tenesa·HeredityPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2019
- Genetic basis of partner choice
Qinwen Zheng, Sjoerd van Alten, … Qiongshi Lu·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2025
- Cross-trait assortative mating is widespread and inflates genetic correlation estimates
Richard Border, Georgios I. Athanasiadis, … Noah Zaitlen·SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2022
- Assortative mating and within-spouse pair comparisons
Laurence J Howe, Thomas Battram, … George Davey Smith·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2021