Genome biologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens
Naihui ZhouiD, Yuxiang JiangiD, Timothy R. BergquistiD, Alexandra J. LeeiD, Balint Z KacsohiD, Alex W. CrockeriD, Kimberley A. LewisiD, George P. GeorghiouiD, Huy N. Nguyen, Md-Nafiz HamidiD, Larry Davis, Tunca DoğaniD, Volkan AtalayiD, Ahmet Süreyya RifaioğluiD, Alperen DalkıraniD, Rengül Çetin-AtalayiD, Chengxin ZhangiD, Rebecca L. Hurto, Peter L. FreddolinoiD, Yang ZhangiD, Prajwal Bhat, Fran SupekiD, José M. FernándeziD, Branislava GemovićiD, Vladimir PerovićiD, , Enrico LavezzoiD
Abstract
The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is an ongoing, global, community-driven effort to evaluate and improve the computational annotation of protein function. Here we report on the results of the third CAFA challenge, CAFA3, that featured an expanded analysis over the previous CAFA rounds, both in terms of volume of data analyzed and the types of analysis performed. In a novel and major new development, computational predictions and assessment goals drove some of the experimental assays, resulting in new functional annotations for more than 1000 genes. Specifically, we performed experimental whole-genome mutation screening in Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aureginosa genomes, which provided us with genome-wide experimental data for genes associated with biofilm formation and motility (P. aureginosa only). We further performed targeted assays on selected genes in Drosophila melanogaster, which we suspected of being involved in long-term memory. We conclude that, while predictions of the molecular function and biological process annotations have slightly improved over time, those of the cellular component have not. Term-centric prediction of experimental annotations remains equally challenging; although the performance of the top methods is significantly better than expectations set by baseline methods in C. albicans and D. melanogaster, it leaves considerable room and need for improvement. We finally report that the CAFA community now involves a broad range of participants with expertise in bioinformatics, biological experimentation, biocuration, and bioontologies, working together to improve functional annotation, computational function prediction, and our ability to manage big data in the era of large experimental screens.
- organism: C. elegans
- organism: Drosophila
- organism: yeast
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 452
- FWCI
- 16.21
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Advances in protein function prediction from the fifth CAFA challenge
M. Clara De Paolis Kaluza, Rashika Ramola, … Predrag Radivojac A·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2026
- On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge
Rashika Ramola, M. Clara De Paolis Kaluza, … Maarten J. M. F. Reijnders·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2026
- Mutual Annotation-Based Prediction of Protein Domain Functions with Domain2GO
Erva Ulusoy, Tunca Doğan·Protein SciencePeer-reviewed·May 16, 2024
- Neural network and random forest models in protein function prediction
Kai Hakala, Suwisa Kaewphan, … Filip Ginter·IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2020
- Open issues for protein function assignment in Haloferax volcanii and other halophilic archaea
Friedhelm Pfeiffer, Mike Dyall‐Smith·GenesPeer-reviewed·Jun 24, 2021
- Interactive Tools for Functional Annotation of Bacterial Genomes
Morgan N. Price, Adam P. Arkin·DatabasePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024