bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Deep Brain Stimulation Microelectrodes as a Source of Human Subcortical RNA: Validation of a Low-Input Transcriptomic Protocol
Sandeep Sandeep, Arti SainiiD, Vivek Chouhan, Sanskriti RaiiD, Divya Madathiparambil RadhakrishnaniD, Ümran YamaniD, Arunmozhimaran ElavarasiiD, Divyani GargiD, Animesh Das, Thyagarajan Radhakrishnan, Anu Gupta, Mamta Bhushan SinghiD, Venugopalan Y. VishnuiD, Saroj KumariD, Abhishek Yadav, Ajay Kumar GargiD, Rohit BhatiaiD, Ahmadulla Shariff, Achal Kumar SrivastavaiD, Lata RaniiD, Dattaraj Savarakar, Rajinder KumariD, Manmohan Singh, Kanwaljeet GargiD, Kailash P. BhatiaiD, , Roopa RajaniD
Abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding the molecular basis of Parkinsons disease (PD) phenotypic heterogeneity maybe improved by in vivo access to deep brain tissue. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery offers a unique opportunity: microelectrodes traversing the subthalamic nucleus (STN) carry adherent brain tissue upon withdrawal, providing a source of RNA from subcortical regions in living patients without additional invasive procedures. AimTo develop and validate a low-input RNA extraction and transcriptomic profiling protocol using DBS microelectrodes in post-mortem human brain, to confirm that recovered RNA is of brain rather than blood origin, and to characterise its sub-regional and cellular identity. MethodologyDBS microelectrodes were inserted without image guidance or guide tube into three unfixed post-mortem human brains targeting the STN trajectory. In clinical practice, a guide tube shields the electrode from cortical tissue; its absence here means tissue from the full insertion trajectory may contribute to recovered RNA. Thirty-eight microelectrodes were evaluated across single and pooled strategies. RNA was extracted using a modified RNeasy Micro low-input protocol; libraries prepared using NEBNext Single Cell/Low Input RNA Library Kit and sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (paired-end, 2x150 bp). Tissue identity was validated against GTEx v10 (54 tissues) and Allen Human Brain Atlas (ABA, 19 subcortical regions including STN) using Pearson correlation with permutation testing (1,000 permutations) and BH-FDR correction. Transcriptional overlap between subcortical and cortical reference regions was quantified and subcortical-enriched gene filtering performed. ResultsTwenty-five RNA isolates were obtained from 38 microelectrodes; 54.5% of Bioanalyzer-assessed samples achieved RIN [≥]5 (median 7.1; range: 5.9-7.8). Fifteen libraries passed sequencing QC (mean depth 43.0 {+/-} 14.1 million read pairs; mean Q30 83.2 {+/-} 5.6 %). PCA of rlog transformed expression data resolved samples by donor identity. All samples confirmed brain tissue origin by GTEx {tau}-index tissue specificity correlation (n=996 brain and blood specific markers). Brain correlations were highest for frontal cortex (mean r= 0.683 {+/-} 0.072), anterior cingulate cortex (mean r= 0.658 {+/-} 0.069), amygdala (mean r= 0.615 {+/-} 0.068), and basal ganglia including caudate (mean r= 0.553 {+/-} 0.059), putamen (mean r= 0.546 {+/-} 0.059), and nucleus accumbens (mean r= 0.544 {+/-} 0.057); all BH-FDR < 0.05. Cerebellum showed the lowest brain correlations (cerebellar hemisphere: mean r = 0.327 {+/-} 0.039; cerebellum: mean r = 0.314 {+/-} 0.037). Whole blood correlation was strongly negative (mean r= -0.250 {+/-} 0.079), confirming non-haematological origin. ABA genome-wide analysis confirmed positive STN correlation (r=0.54-0.62; permutation p<0.001). MuSiC cell-type deconvolution against the Allen Brain Atlas HMBA-BG snRNA-seq reference identified oligodendrocytes (33.5 {+/-} 17.2%), frontal cortical neurons (9.1 {+/-} 7.0%), STR D1 MSNs (6.0 {+/-} 4.9%), and dopaminergic neurons (1.1{+/-} 2.7%) as the principal cell types, independently corroborating bulk transcriptomic findings at single-cell resolution. ConclusionThis study validates a low-input RNA extraction protocol for DBS microelectrodes, confirming brain-specific transcriptomic profiles consistent with STN-adjacent subcortical sampling. The 96% transcriptional overlap between cortical and subcortical regions, combined with absence of a guide tube in this post-mortem model, limits sub-regional specificity; clinical application with a guide tube would enrich the subcortical signal. These findings provide the methodological framework for in vivo molecular profiling of the human basal ganglia during DBS surgery in PD patients.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Analysis of human brain tissue derived from DBS surgery
Salla M. Kangas, Jaakko Teppo, … Reetta Hinttala·Translational NeurodegenerationPeer-reviewed·Apr 13, 2022
- Flexible graphene-based neurotechnology for high-precision deep brain mapping and neuromodulation in Parkinsonian rats
Nicola Ria, Ahmed Eladly, … Jose Antonio Garrido·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2025
- Optogenetic fMRI reveals therapeutic circuits of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
Yuhui Li, Sung‐Ho Lee, … Warren M. Grill·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2024
- Cortical E-fields of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients exceed typical E-field magnitudes of transcranial electrical stimulation
Thomas Keizers, Axel Thielscher, … Bettina C. Schwab·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2026
- Deep brain stimulation modulates the dynamics of resting-state networks in patients with Parkinson's Disease
Maria T. Gomes, Henrique Miguel Fernandes, Joana Cabral·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2020
- Therapeutic Deep Brain Stimulation Disrupts Subthalamic Nucleus Activity Dynamics in Parkinsonian Mice
Jonathan S. Schor, Isabelle Gonzalez Montalvo, … Alexandra Nelson·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 4, 2022