Journal of the American Society for Mass SpectrometryBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Gaussian Mixture Modeling Extensions for Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation in GC-MS Metabolomics
Javier E. FloresiD, Lisa BrameriD, David J. DegnaniD, Vanessa PaurusiD, Yuri CoriloiD, Chaevien S. ClendineniD
Abstract
The ability to reliably identify small molecules (e.g. metabolites) is key towards driving scientific advancement in metabolomics. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is an analytic method that may be applied to facilitate this process. The typical GC-MS identification workflow involves quantifying the similarity of an observed sample spectrum and other features (e.g. retention index) to that of several references, noting the compound of the best-matching reference spectrum as the identified metabolite. While a deluge of similarity metrics exists, none quantify the error rate of generated identifications, thereby presenting an unknown risk of false identification or discovery. To quantify this unknown risk, we propose a model-based framework for estimating the false discovery rate (FDR) among a set of identifications. Extending a traditional mixture modeling framework, our method incorporates both similarity score and experimental information in estimating the FDR. We apply these models to identification lists derived from across 548 samples of varying complexity and sample type (e.g. fungal species, standard mixtures, etc.), comparing their performance to that of the traditional Gaussian mixture model (GMM). Through simulation, we additionally assess the impact of reference library size on the accuracy of FDR estimates. In comparing the best performing model extensions to the GMM, our results indicate relative decreases in median absolute estimation error (MAE) ranging from 12% to 70%, based on comparisons of the median MAEs across all hit-lists. Results indicate that these relative performance improvements generally hold despite library size, however FDR estimation error typically worsens as the set of reference compounds diminishes. For TOC graphic only O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=74 SRC="FIGDIR/small/527348v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (11K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ab9e2eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11e0d8aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ae2acorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a7ae20_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Field percentile
- top 44%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating Retention Index Score Assumptions to Refine GC-MS Metabolite Identification
David J. Degnan, Lisa Bramer, … Chaevien S. Clendinen·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2023
- Comparison of a GC-Orbitrap-MS with Parallel GC-FID Capabilities for Metabolomics of Human Serum
Biswapriya B. Misra, Ekong Bassey, Michael Olivier·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2019
- Significance estimation for large scale untargeted metabolomics annotations
Kerstin Scheubert, Franziska Hufsky, … Sebastian Böcker·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2017
- A generalizable method for false-discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry-based lipidomics
Grant M. Fujimoto, Jennifer E Kyle, … Samuel Payne·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2020
- MassID provides near complete annotation of metabolomics data with identification probabilities
Ethan Stancliffe, Monil Gandhi, … Gary J. Patti·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2026
- Introducing identification probability for automated and transferable assessment of metabolite identification confidence in metabolomics and related studies
Thomas O. Metz, Christine H. Chang, … David Scott Wishart·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2024