MicrobiomeBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Genomes from uncultivated prokaryotes: a comparison of metagenome-assembled and single-amplified genomes
Johannes AlnebergiD, Christofer M. G. Karlsson, Anna‐Maria Divne, Claudia BerginiD, Félix HomaiD, Markus V. LindhiD, Luisa Warchavchik HugerthiD, Thijs J. G. EttemaiD, Stefan BertilssoniD, Anders F. AnderssoniD, Jarone PinhassiiD
Abstract
BackgroundProkaryotes dominate the biosphere and regulate biogeochemical processes essential to all life. Yet, our knowledge about their biology is for the most part limited to the minority that has been successfully cultured. Molecular techniques now allow for obtaining genome sequences of uncultivated prokaryotic taxa, facilitating in-depth analyses that may ultimately improve our understanding of these key organisms.\n\nResultsWe compared results from two culture-independent strategies for recovering bacterial genomes: single-amplified genomes and metagenome-assembled genomes. Single-amplified genomes were obtained from samples collected at an offshore station in the Baltic Sea Proper and compared to previously obtained metagenome-assembled genomes from a time series at the same station. Among 16 single-amplified genomes analyzed, seven were found to match metagenome-assembled genomes, affiliated with a diverse set of taxa. Notably, genome pairs between the two approaches were nearly identical (>98.7% identity) across overlapping regions (30-80% of each genome). Within matching pairs, the single-amplified genomes were consistently smaller and less complete, whereas the genetic functional profiles were maintained. For the metagenome-assembled genomes, only on average 3.6% of the bases were estimated to be missing from the genomes due to wrongly binned contigs; the metagenome assembly was found to cause incompleteness to a higher degree than the binning procedure.\n\nConclusionsThe strong agreement between the single-amplified and metagenome-assembled genomes emphasizes that both methods generate accurate genome information from uncultivated bacteria. Importantly, this implies that the research questions and the available resources are allowed to determine the selection of genomics approach for microbiome studies.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 116
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Metagenomic assembly of new (sub)arctic Cyanobacteria and their associated microbiome from non-axenic cultures
Luc Cornet, Amandine R. Bertrand, … Denis Baurain·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2018
- Evaluating metagenomic assembly approaches for biome-specific gene catalogues
Luis Fernando Delgado, Anders F. Andersson·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·May 6, 2022
- Metagenome-assembled genomes uncover a global brackish microbiome
Luisa W Hugerth, John Larsson, … Anders F Andersson·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2015
- Recovery of high-quality assembled genomes via metagenome binning guided with single-cell amplified genomes
K. Arikawa, K. Ide, … M. Hosokawa·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2021
- SingleM and Sandpiper: Robust microbial taxonomic profiles from metagenomic data
B. J. Woodcroft, S. T. N. Aroney, … G. W. Tyson·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2024
- scMicrobe PTA: Near Complete Genomes From Single Bacterial Cells
Robert M. Bowers, Veronica Gonzalez-Pena, … Charles Gawad·ISME CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024