bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
An interlaboratory study of complex variant detection
Stephen E. LincolniD, Justin M. ZookiD, Shimul ChowdhuryiD, Shazia Mahamdallie, ANDREW P. FELLOWESiD, Eric W. KleeiD, Rebecca TrutyiD, Catherine Huang, Farol L. Tomson, Megan H. ClevelandiD, Peter M. ValloneiD, Yan DingiD, Sheila Seal, Wasanthi DeSilva, Russell K. GarlickiD, Marc SalitiD, Nazneen RahmaniD, Stephen Francis KingsmoreiD, Swaroop AradhyaiD, Robert Luke NussbaumiD, Matthew J. FerberiD, Brian H. ShirtsiD
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is widely used and cost-effective. Depending on the specific methods, NGS can have limitations detecting certain technically challenging variant types even though they are both prevalent in patients and medically important. These types are underrepresented in validation studies, hindering the uniform assessment of test methodologies by laboratory directors and clinicians. Specimens containing such variants can be difficult to obtain; thus, we evaluated a novel solution to this problem in which a diverse set of technically challenging variants was synthesized and introduced into a known genomic background. This specimen was sequenced by 7 laboratories using 10 different NGS workflows. The specimen was compatible with all 10 workflows and presented biochemical and bioinformatic challenges similar to those of patient specimens. Only 10 of 22 challenging variants were correctly identified by all 10 workflows, and only 3 workflows detected all 22. Many, but not all, of the sensitivity limitations were bioinformatic in nature. We conclude that Synthetic controls can provide an efficient and informative mechanism to augment studies with technically challenging variants that are difficult to obtain otherwise. Data from such specimens can facilitate inter-laboratory methodologic comparisons and can help establish standards that improve communication between clinicians and laboratories.
- Citations
- 11
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: An analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation
Stephen E. Lincoln, Tina M. Hambuch, … Robert Luke Nussbaum·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 18, 2021
- A Rigorous Interlaboratory Examination of the Need to Confirm NGS-Detected Variants by an Orthogonal Method in Clinical Genetic Testing
Stephen E. Lincoln, Rebecca Truty, … Matthew S. Lebo·Journal of Molecular DiagnosticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2019
- Sanger validation of WGS variants - when to?
Arina Kopernik, Г.Ю. Зобкова, … Pavel Volchkov·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2024
- Evaluation of false positive and false negative errors in targeted next generation sequencing
Youngbeen Moon, Young-Ho Kim, … Kyeong‐Man Hong·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Recommendations for Bioinformatics in Clinical Practice
Ksenia Lavrichenko, Emilie Sofie Engdal, … Frederik Otzen Bagger·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2025
- SafeMut: UMI-aware variant simulator incorporating allele-fraction overdispersion in read editing
Xiaofei Zhao, Jingyu Guo, Sizhen Wang·Informatics in Medicine UnlockedPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023