Author

Sarah Wang

University of PittsburghORCID 0000-0002-2934-1410Unclaimed ORCID profile · follow to get notified of new preprints

Additional preprints under this name without ORCID

Sarah Wang1 paper · University of Cincinnati

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Cancer Biology· 2

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Approach:benchmark study· 1 Research Focus:benchmarking· 1 Research Focus:cell type annotation· 1 Research Focus:drug response / drug discovery· 1 Approach:experimental assay· 1 Organism:mouse· 1 Assay:scRNA-seq· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian V. LeeiD· 2 shared Fangyuan CheniD· 2 shared George C. TsengiD· 2 shared Steffi OesterreichiD· 2 shared Alexander Chih-Chieh ChangiD· 1 shared Azadeh NasrazadaniiD· 1 shared Brent Thomas SchlegeliD· 1 shared Carlos A. CastroiD· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2026-2026 · peak 2/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 37 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

2 shared papersCancer Biology

Adrian V. LeeORCID

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

2 papers

Recent·Most cited

Cancer BiologybioRxivPreprintJun 10, 2026

Estrogen receptor-positive cell line xenograft models recapitulate metastatic dissemination and endocrine response of invasive lobular breast carcinoma

Nilgun Tasdemir, Laura Savariau, Julie A. Scott…·Steffi Oesterreich

This study shows that ER-positive ILC xenograft models replicate metastatic patterns and endocrine response of human invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

1 citation

mouseexperimental assay

𝕏 PostBluesky

Cancer BiologybioRxivPreprintApr 15, 2026

Benchmarking scRNA-seq Copy Number Inference: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Practitioner Guide

Hung-Ching Chang, Yuxin Shi, Haoyu Cheng…·George C. Tseng

This study benchmarks 12 scRNA-seq CNV inference methods across 28 datasets, finding allele-aware tools perform better with high-quality allelic data, while expression-centric tools are reliable with raw data.

DOI 10.64898/2026.04.12.718050

scRNA-seqbenchmark study

𝕏 PostBluesky