Neuro-OncologyCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Distinct tumor immune microenvironmental (TIME) landscapes drive divergent immunotherapy responses in glioblastoma
Linqian WengiD, Krish Skandha GopalaniD, Mélanie GuyotiD, Maxime VanmecheleniD, Pouya NazariiD, Marie DuhameliD, Clelia DonisiiD, Carla Pallarés-MoratallaiD, Abhishek Dinkarnath GargiD, Kieron WhiteiD, Annette T. ByrneiD, Diether LambrechtsiD, Frederik De SmetiD, Gabriele BergersiD
Abstract
BackgroundImmunotherapies have improved outcomes in many cancers but show limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). This study aimed to determine whether immunotherapy could be tailored to GBM by functional subtyping of vascular-immune landscapes. MethodsWe employed single-cell RNA sequencing, multiplex immunohistochemistry to characterize three distinct TIME subtypes in human and murine GBMs. We evaluated responses to combination of anti-angiogenic immunomodulating therapies (CD40 Ag, anti-PDL1, PI3K{gamma}/{delta} inhibition) in orthotopic syngeneic GBM mouse models. ResultsWe identified three distinct functional TIME subtypes with unique vascular-immune landscapes in human and murine GBM: TIME-low (immune-low/deserted, leaky vasculature), TIME-med (intermediate immune-infiltration, angiogenic), and TIME-high (heavily infiltrated with immunosuppressive myeloid cells and dysfunctional T cells). Representative mouse models of TIME-GBMs responded in subtype specific ways to anti-angiogenic immunomodulating therapies. TIME-low GBMs enhanced T-cell activity but relapsed due to emerging myeloid immunosuppression, concomitant with mesenchymal transition. TIME-med displayed the most immune-activated, yet angiogenic phenotype, and showed overall good responses to various anti-angiogenic immunomodulating therapies. TIME-high GBMs were mostly non-responsive but improved when the myeloid-cell PI3K{gamma} was targeted. However, CD40 agonist treatment, expected to enhance APC function, unexpectedly worsened survival by promoting angiogenesis and heightening immunosuppression, leading to dysfunctional T cells and reduced NK cell recruitment, and subsequent enhanced tumor propagation. ConclusionsOur study reveals three GBM TIME subtypes with distinct vascular-immune landscapes that require tailored therapies. TIME-med tumors are predicted to respond best to immunotherapies, TIME-low tumors show transient effects with anti-angiogenic immunomodulating therapies, while TIME-high tumors, due to their profound immunosuppression, can even have worse outcomes. Key pointsO_LIThree TIME subtypes were identified in GBM with distinct vascular-immune landscapes C_LIO_LITIME subtypes show divergent immunotherapy responses C_LIO_LITIME classification supports personalized treatment strategy for GBM immunotherapy C_LI Importance of the StudyThis study advances glioblastoma immunotherapy by providing the first comprehensive single-cell characterization of TIME subtypes, moving beyond bulk RNA-sequencing to reveal detailed functional states of immune cells. We establish clinically relevant murine models that recapitulate human TIME subtypes, enabling preclinical testing of TIME-targeted therapies. Our findings identify TIME-low GBM as immune deserted and TIME-med tumors as the most immunotherapy-responsive subtype that should be prioritized for clinical selection. We found that high immune infiltration correlates with non-responsiveness and even unexpected detrimental effects with CD40 agonist treatment in TIME-high tumors--critical information given ongoing clinical trials. Identifying distinct immunosuppressive mechanisms across TIME subtypes and differential treatment responses provides a framework for personalized immunotherapy selection. The immediate translational impact of this work highlights the importance of TIME classification for treatment stratification and the urgent need to consider TIME status in clinical trial design, potentially explaining variable patient responses in previous GBM immunotherapy trials.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- IL-6 underlies microenvironment immunosuppression and resistance to therapy in glioblastoma
Jacob S. Young, Nam Woo Cho, … David Ronan Raleigh·Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 13, 2026
- Deep immune profiling reveals targetable mechanisms of immune evasion in checkpoint blockade-refractory glioblastoma
E. F. Simonds, E. D. Lu, … M. Hellstrom·bioRxiv·Dec 1, 2020
- Temporal and spatial modulation of the immune response of the murine Gl261 glioma tumor microenvironment
K. J. McKelvey, A. L. Hudson, … V. M. Howell·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2019
- Local Tumor Microenvironment Niches Correlate with Survival and Immunotherapy Response in Human Glioblastoma
Florent Petitprez, Nicola Graham, … Jeffrey W. Pollard·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026
- Changes in the tumor microenvironment and treatment outcome in glioblastoma: A pilot study
S. Ali, T. F. Borin, … M. H. Rashid·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2020
- Immunotherapy of glioblastoma explants induces interferon-γ responses and immune cell rearrangements in tumor center, but not periphery
T. Shekarian, C. Zinner, … G. Hutter·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2022