Method to quickly map multifocal Pupillary Response Fields (mPRF) using Frequency Tagging
Jean LorenceauiD, Suzon Ajasse, Raphael Barbet, Muriel BoucartiD, Frédéric ChavaneiD, Cédric LamireliD, Richard LegrasiD, F. MatontiiD, Maxence RateauxiD, Jean‐François RoulandiD, José‐Alain SaheliD, Laure TrinquetiD, Mark WexleriD, Catherine Vignal‐Clermont
Abstract
We present a method for mapping multifocal Pupillary Response Fields in a short amount of time, using a visual stimulus covering 40{degrees} of visual angle, divided in 9 contiguous sectors, simultaneously modulated in luminance at specific, incommensurate, temporal frequencies. We tested this multiple Pupillary Frequency Tagging (mPFT) approach with young healthy participants (N=36), and show that the spectral power of the sustained pupillary response elicited by 45 seconds of fixation of this multipartite stimulus reflects the relative contribution of each sector/frequency to the overall pupillary response. We further analyze the phase lag for each temporal frequency as well as several global features related to pupil state. Test retest performed on a subset of participants indicates good repeatability. We also investigate the existence of structural (RNFL)/functional (mPFT) relationships. We then summarize results of clinical studies conducted with mPFT on patients with neuropathies and retinopathies and show that the features derived from pupillary signal analyzes, the distribution of spectral power in particular, allows sorting patients from healthy participants with excellent sensitivity and specificity. This method thus appears a convenient, objective and fast tool for assessing the integrity of retino-pupillary circuits, as well as idiosyncrasies, that permits to objectively detect or follow-up retinopathies or neuropathies in a short amount of time.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Field percentile
- top 21%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Light stimulation system for measuring pupillary light responses based on Maxwellian view optical system using a retina presentation type viewfinder
Taisuke Eto, Takuya Yoshiike, … Shingo Kitamura·Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGYPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2026
- Visual mapping on the brain - caveats for multifocal fMRI
David P. Crewther, Shaun A Seixas, Sheila G. Crewther·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2019
- Comparing flickering and pulsed chromatic pupil light responses
C. Tripolone, L. Issolio, … P. A. Barrionuevo·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2022
- Pulses of melanopsin-directed contrast produce highly reliable pupil responses that are insensitive to a change in background radiance
Harrison M. McAdams, Aleksandra Igdalova, … Geoffrey K. Aguirre·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2018
- Cross-dataset reproducibility of human retinotopic maps
Marc M. Himmelberg, Jan W. Kurzawski, … Jonathan A. Winawer·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2021
- Population receptive field estimates for motion-defined stimuli
Anna E. Hughes, John A. Greenwood, … Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 31, 2019