bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Genomic and Epigenetic Interplay Drives Adaptive Fusion via Reproduction Trade-Off
Yang CheniD, Lin Bi, Xiaoli FaniD, Shuang LiangiD, Chengyuan LiiD, Yihong WangiD, Sophie G. MartiniD, Gaowen LiuiD
Abstract
Investment in sexual reproduction has long been seen as a fitness cost for asexual proliferation, raising the question of how cells evolve to accommodate cyclical demands of sexual and asexual cycles. We addressed this question by evolving Schizosaccharomyces pombe lacking the critical fusion gene Prm1 through 18 cycles of alternating meiosis and mitosis. Initially, transcriptional tweaks offered a fragile means to fuse despite Prm1s absence. However, a telomeric 1% genome deletion that epigenetically silenced Clr5 ultimately locked in a latent, Prm1-independent fusion pathway involving the mating regulator Ste11 and the pheromone-MAPK scaffold Sms1. This adaptation, though efficient at restoring sexual reproduction, came at the cost of mitotic growth. By contrast, rationally constructing mutations in a "synthetic evolution" approach bypassed the trade-off, enabling simultaneous high fusion efficiency and near-wild-type proliferation. Our findings illustrate how epigenetic de-repression and genetic assimilation converge to create innovative solutions under cyclical selection pressures with trade-offs.
- organism: yeast
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: genetic perturbation / CRISPR
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic segregation and fusion: Mitochondrial mixing facilitated the evolution of sex at the origin of eukaryotes
Arunas L Radzvilavicius·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2016
- Why Do Hybrids Turn Down Sex?
F. Fyon, W. M. Berbel-Filho, … F. Ubeda·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2023
- Cyclic parthenogenesis helps populations cross fitness valleys
Zimo Yang, Nate B. Hardy·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2026
- The risk of sexual reproduction promotes the evolution of regulation between host and symbionts
Alkmini Zania, Paulien Hogeweg, Samuel H. A. von der Dunk·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2026
- Asexual Adaptation Drives Transient and Reversible Changes in Mating Efficiency.
Prachitha Nagendra, Deesha Kansara, … Supreet Saini·bioRxiv·May 16, 2026
- Frequent sexual reproduction limits adaptation in outcrossed populations of the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
F. Moerman, N. Colegrave·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2022