Working Towards a Blood-Derived Gene Expression Biomarker Specific for Alzheimer’s Disease
Hamel PateliD, Raquel IniestaiD, Daniel R. StahliD, Richard DobsoniD, Stephen NewhouseiD
Abstract
BackgroundA significant number of studies have investigated the use of blood-derived gene expression profiling as a biomarker for Alzheimers Disease (AD). However, the typical approach of developing classification models trained on subjects with AD and complimentary cognitive healthy controls may result in markers of general illness rather than being AD-specific. Incorporating additional related neurological and age-related disorders during the classification model development process may lead to the discovery of an AD-specific expression signature.\n\nMethodsTwo XGBoost classification models were developed and optimised. The first used the typical approach, training on 160 AD and 160 cognitively normal controls, while the second was trained in 6318 AD and 6318 mixed controls. Up-sampling was performed in each training set to the minority classes to avoid sampling bias, and both classification models were evaluated in an independent dataset consisting of 127 AD and 687 mixed controls. The mixed control group represents a heterogeneous ageing population consisting of Parkinsons Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Coronary Artery Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and cognitively healthy subjects.\n\nResultsThe typical approach resulted in a 74 gene classification model with a validation performance of 58.3% sensitivity, 30.3% specificity, 13.4% PPV and 79.7% NPV. In contrast, the second approach resulted in a 28 gene classification model with an overall improved validation performance of 46.5% sensitivity, 95.6% specificity, 66.3% PPV and 90.6% NPV.\n\nConclusionsThe addition of related neurological and age-related disorders into the AD classification model developmental process identified a more AD-specific expression signature, with improved ability to distinguish AD from other related diseases and cognitively healthy controls. However, this was at the cost of sensitivity. Further improvement is still required to identify a robust blood transcriptomic signature specific to AD.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Analysis of Blood Gene Expression Data Toward Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease
Hamed Taheri Gorji, Ramtin Kardan, Neda Rezagholizadeh·medRxiv·Jul 26, 2021
- Identification of common molecular biomarker signatures in blood and brain of Alzheimers disease
Md Rezanur Rahman, Tania Islam, … Mohammad Ali Moni·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2019
- A diagnostic plasma omics-biomarker for Alzheimer's disease informed by microglial single-cell transcriptomics: A pilot study
Michael William Lutz, Zhaohui Man, … Ornit Chiba‐Falek·Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical InterventionsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026
- The healthy ageing gene expression signature for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis: a random sampling perspective
Laurent Jacob, Terence P Speed·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2016
- Functional Genetic Biomarkers Of Alzheimer's Disease And Gene Expression From Peripheral Blood
Andrew Ni, Amish Sethi, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2021
- Sex-Specific Cross Tissue Meta-Analysis Identifies Immune Dysregulation in Women with Alzheimer's Disease
Manish D. Paranjpe, Stella A. Belonwu, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Frontiers in Aging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2021