Motion prediction enables simulated MR-imaging of freely moving model organisms
Markus ReischliD, Mazin JoudaiD, Neil MacKinnoniD, Erwin FuhreriD, Natalia A. BakhtinaiD, Andreas Bartschat, Ralf MikutiD, Jan Gerrit KorvinkiD
Abstract
AbstractMagnetic resonance tomography typically applies the Fourier transform to k-space signals repeatedly acquired from a frequency encoded spatial region of interest, therefore requiring a stationary object during scanning. Any movement of the object results in phase errors in the recorded signal, leading to deformed images, phantoms, and artifacts, since the encoded information does not originate from the intended region of the object. However, if the type and magnitude of movement is known instantaneously, the scanner or the reconstruction algorithm could be adjusted to compensate for the movement, directly allowing high quality imaging with non-stationary objects. This would be an enormous boon to studies that tie cell metabolomics to spontaneous organism behaviour, eliminating the stress otherwise necessitated by restraining measures such as anesthesia or clamping.\n\nIn the present theoretical study, we use a phantom of the animal model C. elegans to examine the feasibility to automatically predict its movement and position, and to evaluate the impact of movement prediction, within a sufficiently long time horizon, on image reconstruction. For this purpose, we use automated image processing to annotate body parts in freely moving C. elegans, and predict their path of movement. We further introduce an MRI simulation platform based on brightfield-videos of the moving worm, combined with a stack of high resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) slice images as virtual high resolution phantoms. A phantom provides an indication of the spatial distribution of signal-generating nuclei on a particular imaging slice. We show that adjustment of the scanning to the predicted movements strongly reduces distortions in the resulting image, opening the door for implementation in a high-resolution NMR scanner.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 19th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Active head motion reduction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging using tactile feedback
Florian Krause, Caroline Benjamins, … Rainer Goebel·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2019
- Evidence for a sensorimotor prediction process in action observation
Pauline M. Hilt, Nicolas Gueugneau, … Charalambos Papaxanthis·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2023
- 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Freely Moving Human Eye
B. Franceschiello, L. Di Sopra, … M. M. Murray·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2020
- MR-PET head motion correction based on co-registration of multi-contrast MR images
Zhaolin Chen, Francesco Sforazzini, … Gary F. Egan·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2019
- Controlling motion artefact levels in MR images by suspending data acquisition during periods of head motion
Rémi Castella, Lionel Arn, … Antoine Lutti·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2018
- Neural space-time model for dynamic scene recovery in multi-shot computational imaging systems
R. Cao, N. S. Divekar, … L. Waller·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2024