bioRxivPlant Biology
Differences in RAD51 transcriptional response and cell cycle dynamics reveal varying sensitivity to DNA damage among Arabidopsis thaliana root cell types
K. Kutashev, A. Meschichi, S. Reeck, A. Fonseca, K. Sartori, C. I. White, A. Sicard, S. Rosa
Abstract
O_LIThroughout their lifecycle, plants are subjected to DNA damage from various sources, both environmental and endogenous. Investigating the mechanisms of the DNA damage response (DDR) is essential to unravel how plants adjust to the changing environment that can elicit varying amounts of DNA damage. C_LIO_LIUsing a combination of state-of-the-art cell biology methods including whole-mount single-molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (WM-smFISH), allowing detection of individual mRNA molecules in intact plant tissue and plant cell cycle reporter lines we investigated how the transcriptional activation of a key homologous recombination (HR) gene, RAD51, occurs in response to increasing amounts of DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. C_LIO_LIThe results uncover consistent variations in RAD51 transcriptional response and cell cycle arrest among distinct cell types and developmental zones. Furthermore, we demonstrate that DNA damage induced by genotoxic stress results in RAD51 transcription throughout the whole cell cycle, dissociating its traditional link with S/G2 phases. C_LIO_LIThis work advances the current comprehension of DNA damage response in plants showing quantitative differences in DDR activation. In addition, it reveals new associations with the cell cycle and cell types, providing crucial insights for further studies of the broader response mechanisms in plants. C_LI
- organism: Arabidopsis
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The plant-specific DDR factor SOG1 increases chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage
A. Meschichi, S. Reeck, … S. Rosa·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2021
- The role of rice SOG1 and SOG1-like in DNA damage response
A. Nishizawa-Yokoi, R. Motoyama, … S. Toki·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2022
- The long non-coding RNA LINDA restrains cellular collapse following DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana
J. Herbst, S. H. Nagy, … R. Kunze·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2023
- DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics Drive Cell Cycle Phase Transitions
Hui Xiao Chao, Cere E. Poovey, … Jeremy E. Purvis·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2017
- The dichotomous effects of caffeine on homologous recombination in mammalian cells
Alissa C Magwood, Maureen M Mundia, … Mark D Baker·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2016
- Rad51 inhibition sensitizes non-replicating quiescent cells to UVB radiation and transcription stress
S. Khan, M. A. Carpenter, M. G. Kemp·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2022