DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics Drive Cell Cycle Phase Transitions
Hui Xiao ChaoiD, Cere E. Poovey, Ashley A. Privette, Gavin D. GrantiD, Hui Yan Chao, Jeanette Gowen CookiD, Jeremy E. PurvisiD
Abstract
DNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed \"commitment point\" within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases. In contrast to G1 and G2, cell cycle progression in S phase is significantly less sensitive to DNA damage. Instead of exhibiting a complete halt, we find that increasing DNA damage doses leads to decreased rates of S-phase progression followed by arrest in the subsequent G2. Moreover, these phase-specific differences in DNA damage checkpoint dynamics are associated with corresponding differences in the proportions of irreversibly arrested cells. Thus, the precise timing of DNA damage determines the sensitivity, rate of cell cycle progression, and functional outcomes for damaged cells. These findings should inform our understanding of cell fate decisions after treatment with common cancer therapeutics such as genotoxins or spindle poisons, which often target cells in a specific cell cycle phase.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Checkpoint non-fidelity induces a complex landscape of lineage fitness after DNA damage
Callum J. Campbell, Ashok R. Venkitaraman, Alessandro Esposito·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2018
- An ATM/Wip1-dependent timer controls the minimal duration of a DNA-damage mediated cell cycle arrest
Himjyot Jaiswal, Jan Benada, … Arne Lindqvist·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2016
- Checkpoint inhibition of origin firing prevents inappropriate replication outside of S-phase
M. C. Johnson, G. Can, … P. Zegerman·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2020
- CDK2 activity determines the timing of cell-cycle commitment and sequential DNA replication
S. Kim, A. Leong, … H. W. Yang·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- Prolonged Cell Cycle Arrest in Response to DNA damage in Yeast Requires the Maintenance of DNA Damage Signaling and the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Felix Y. Zhou, David P. Waterman, … James E. Haber·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2024
- Timing of DNA damage checkpoint adaptation predicts post-mitotic proliferative competence
Ambra Dondi, Erika Calabrese, … Rosella Visintin·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026