Taking the next-gen step: comprehensive antimicrobial resistance detection from Burkholderia pseudomallei
Danielle E. MaddeniD, Jessica R. WebbiD, Eike J. SteinigiD, Bart J. CurrieiD, Erin P. PriceiD, Derek S. SarovichiD
Abstract
BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to human health. Whole-genome sequencing holds great potential for AMR identification; however, there remain major gaps in comprehensively detecting AMR across the spectrum of AMR-conferring determinants and pathogens. MethodsUsing 16 wild-type Burkholderia pseudomallei and 25 with acquired AMR, we first assessed the performance of existing AMR software (ARIBA and CARD) for detecting clinically relevant AMR in this pathogen. B. pseudomallei was chosen due to limited treatment options, high fatality rate, and AMR caused exclusively by chromosomal mutation (i.e. single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs], insertions-deletions [indels], copy-number variations [CNVs], and functional gene loss). Due to poor performance with existing tools, we developed ARDaP (Antimicrobial Resistance Detection and Prediction) to identify the spectrum of AMR-conferring determinants in B. pseudomallei. ResultsCARD failed to identify any clinically-relevant AMR in B. pseudomallei, ARIBA cannot differentiate AMR determinants from natural genetic variation, and neither CARD or ARIBA can identify CNV or gene loss determinants. In contrast, ARDaP accurately detected all SNP, indel, CNV, and gene loss AMR determinants described in B. pseudomallei (n{approx}50). Additionally, ARDaP accurately predicted three previously undescribed determinants. In mixed strain data, ARDaP identified AMR to as low as ~5% allelic frequency. ConclusionsWe demonstrate that existing AMR software are inadequate for comprehensive AMR detection; ARDaP overcomes the shortcomings of existing tools. Further, ARDaP enables AMR prediction from mixed sequence data down to 5% allelic frequency. ARDaP databases can be constructed for any microbial species of interest for comprehensive AMR detection.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 43
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Field percentile
- top 15%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads
Martin Hunt, Alison E. Mather, … Simon R. Harris·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2017
- Bridging the gap between bioinformatics and the clinical and public health microbiology laboratory: An ISO-accredited genomics workflow for antimicrobial resistance
N. L. Sherry, K. Horan, … T. Seemann·bioRxiv·May 26, 2022
- Using the NCBI AMRFinder Tool to Determine Antimicrobial Resistance Genotype-Phenotype Correlations Within a Collection of NARMS Isolates
M. Feldgarden, V. Brover, … W. Klimke·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2019
- A Novel Amino Acid Deletion and Substitution in amrB Gene Associated with Gentamicin Susceptibility in Burkholderia pseudomallei from Malaysian Borneo
A. Hussin, S. Nathan, … N. Ibrahim·bioRxiv·May 31, 2023
- Towards routine employment of computational tools for antimicrobial resistance determination via high-throughput sequencing
Simone Marini, Rodrigo Antonio Mora-Rodríguez, … Mattia Prosperi·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2022
- Development and validation of a triplex qPCR assay to detect efflux pump-mediated antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei
J. R. Webb, E. P. Price, … D. S. Sarovich·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2018