bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
The price of defence: toxins, visual signals and oxidative state in an aposematic butterfly
J. D. Blount, H. M. Rowland, C. Mitchell, M. P. Speed, G. D. Ruxton, J. A. Endler, L. P. Brower
Abstract
In a variety of aposematic species, the conspicuousness of an individuals warning signal and the quantity of its chemical defence are positively correlated. This apparent honest signalling is predicted by resource competition models which assume that the production and maintenance of aposematic defences compete for access to antioxidant molecules that have dual functions as pigments and in protecting against oxidative damage. We raised monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) on their milkweed host-plants (Apocynaceae) with increasing quantities of cardenolides to test whether (1) the sequestration of secondary defences is associated with costs in the form of oxidative lipid damage and reduced antioxidant defences; and (2) that reduced oxidative state can decrease the capacity of individuals to produce aposematic displays. In male monarchs conspicuousness was explained by an interaction between oxidative damage and sequestration: males with high levels of oxidative damage become less conspicuous with increased sequestration of cardenolides, whereas those with low oxidative damage become more conspicuous with increased levels of cardenolides. There was no significant effect of oxidative damage or concentration of sequestered cardenolides on female conspicuousness. Our results demonstrate a physiological linkage between the production of coloration and protection from autotoxicity, and differential costs of signalling in monarch butterflies.
- organism: Drosophila
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Chemical defences indicate distinct colour patterns with reduced variability in aposematic nudibranchs
C. P. van den Berg, M. Santon, … K. L. Cheney·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2023
- Monarchs sabotage milkweed to acquire toxins, not to disarm plant defence
A. Betz, R. Bischoff, G. Petschenka·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2023
- Cardenolide toxin diversity impacts monarch butterfly growth and sequestration
Anurag A Agrawal, Amy Picard Hastings, Paola Andrea Rubiano-Buitrago·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2026
- Signal detectability and boldness are not the same: the function of defensive colouration in nudibranchs is distance-dependent
C. P. van den Berg, J. A. Endler, K. L. Cheney·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2022
- Phylogeny not mimicry drives chemical variation in tropical aposematic butterflies
R. Blow, S. Ehlers, … C. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2023
- Evolutionary and ecological processes influencing chemical defense variation in an aposematic and mimetic Heliconius butterfly
A. L. K. Mattila, C. D. Jiggins, … M. Saastamoinen·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2020