Sign in
NeuroscienceeLife
Peer-reviewed journal article

Analysis of Rod/Cone Gap Junctions from the Reconstruction of Mouse Photoreceptor Terminals

Munenori IshibashiiD, Joyce Keung, Catherine W. MorgansiD, Sue A. AicheriD, James R. CarrolliD, Joshua H. SingeriD, Li Jia, Wei LiiD, Iris Fahrenfort, Christophe RibelaygaiD, Stephen C. MasseyiD

Abstract

Using serial blockface-scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) and focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), combined with confocal microscopy for the gap junction protein Cx36, we reconstructed mouse photoreceptor terminals and located the gap junctions between them. An exuberant spray of fine telodendria extends from each cone pedicle (including blue cones) to contact 40-50 nearby rod spherules where Cx36 clusters were located, close to the mouth of the synaptic opening. There were approximately 50 Cx36 clusters per cone pedicle and 2-3 per rod spherule. We were unable to detect rod/rod or cone/cone coupling. Thus, rod/cone coupling accounts for nearly all gap junctions between photoreceptors. Our calculations suggest a mean of 82 Cx36 channels between a rod/cone pair of which 25% are open at rest. Rod/cone gap junctions are modulated by dopamine. Comparing our morphological calculations of maximum coupling to previous physiological results suggests that dopamine antagonists can drive rod/cone gap junctions to a surprisingly high open probability, approaching 100%.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
32
FWCI
1.96
Field percentile
top 13%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.