American Journal of EpidemiologyGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A Hierarchical Approach Using Marginal Summary Statistics for Multiple Intermediates in a Mendelian Randomization or Transcriptome Analysis
Lai JiangiD, Shujing XuiD, Nicholas MancusoiD, Paul J. NewcombeiD, David V. ContiiD
Abstract
BackgroundPrevious research has demonstrated the usefulness of hierarchical modeling for incorporating a flexible array of prior information in genetic association studies. When this prior information consists of effect estimates from association analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)-intermediate or SNP-gene expression, a hierarchical model is equivalent to a two-stage instrumental or transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) analysis, respectively. MethodsWe propose to extend our previous approach for the joint analysis of marginal summary statistics (JAM) to incorporate prior information via a hierarchical model (hJAM). In this framework, the use of appropriate effect estimates as prior information yields an analysis similar to Mendelian Randomization (MR) and TWAS approaches such as FUSION and S-PrediXcan. However, hJAM is applicable to multiple correlated SNPs and multiple correlated intermediates to yield conditional estimates of effect for the intermediate on the outcome, thus providing advantages over alternative approaches. ResultsWe investigate the performance of hJAM in comparison to existing MR approaches (inverse-variance weighted MR and multivariate MR) and existing TWAS approaches (S-PrediXcan) for effect estimation, type-I error and empirical power. We apply hJAM to two examples: estimating the conditional effects of body mass index and type 2 diabetes on myocardial infarction and estimating the effects of the expressions of gene NUCKS1 and PM20D1 on the risk of prostate cancer. ConclusionsAcross numerous causal simulation scenarios, we demonstrate that hJAM is unbiased, maintains correct type-I error and has increased power. Key MessagesO_LIMendelian randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) can be viewed as similar approaches via a hierarchical model. C_LIO_LIThe hierarchal joint analysis of marginal summary statistics (hJAM) is a multivariate Mendelian randomization approach which offers a simple way to address the pleiotropy bias that is introduced by genetic variants associated with multiple risk factors or expressions of genes. C_LIO_LIhJAM incorporates the linkage disequilibrium structure of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in a reference population to account for the correlation between SNPs. C_LIO_LIIn addition to Mendelian randomization and TWAS, hJAM offers flexibility to incorporate functional or genomic annotation or information from metabolomic studies. C_LI
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Field percentile
- top 31%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations
Fernando Pires Hartwig, Kate M. Tilling, … Maria Carolina Borges·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2021
- Mendelian Randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics
Xianghong Hu, Jia Zhao, … Can Yang·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2022
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using Mixture Models (MRMix) for Genetic Effect-Size-Distribution Leads to Robust Estimation of Causal Effects
Guanghao Qi, Nilanjan Chatterjee·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2019
- Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with the probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies
Zhongshang Yuan, Huanhuan Zhu, … Xiang Zhou·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2020
- Model Checking via Testing for Direct Effects in Mendelian Randomization and Transcriptome-wide Association Studies
Yangqing Deng, Wei Pan·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 2, 2021
- Exploring and accounting for genetically driven effect heterogeneity in Mendelian Randomization
Annika Jaitner, Krasimira T. Tsaneva-Atanasova, … Jack Bowden·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 22, 2024