bioRxivEcology
Mink on the brink: Comparing survey methods for detecting a Critically Endangered carnivore, the European mink Mustela lutreola
E. Croose, R. Hanniffy, A. Harrington, M. Podra, A. Gomez, P. L. Bolton, J. V. Lavin, S. S. Browett, J. P. Ruiz, D. L. Arnaez, I. Galdos, J. Ugarte, A. Torre, P. Wright, J. MacPherson, A. D. McDevitt, S. P. Carter, L. Harrington
Abstract
Monitoring rare and elusive species is critical in guiding appropriate conservation management measures. Mammalian carnivores are challenging to monitor directly, due to their generally nocturnal and solitary lifestyle, and relatively large home ranges. The European mink Mustela lutreola is a Critically Endangered, small, semi-aquatic carnivore and is one of the most threatened mammal species in Europe. In northern Spain, the European mink population is monitored regionally using different methods and approaches, making assessment of national population status difficult. There is an urgent need to 1) assess the efficacy of survey methods, and 2) identify a standard monitoring methodology that can be deployed rapidly and inexpensively over large areas of the minks range. We deployed four methods - camera trapping, hair tubes, live trapping, and environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples - to compare the probability of detecting European mink when present at 25 sampling sites within five 10x10km squares, and the economic cost and time required for each method. All four methods successfully detected European mink but the probability of detection varied by method. Camera trapping and hair tubes had the highest probability of detection; however, eDNA and live trapping detected mink in one 10x10km square where the latter two methods did not. For future European mink monitoring programmes, we recommend a combination of at least two methods, and suggest that camera traps or hair tubes are combined with live trapping or eDNA (depending on the scale and aims of the study), to gather critical information on distribution, occupancy and conservation status.
- organism: mouse
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparative efficiency of eDNA, camera traps and scat surveys to detect a semi-aquatic mammal across multiple catchments
Simon Lacombe, Sébastien Devillard, … Olivier Giménez·Animal ConservationPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2026
- A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity
K. Leempoel, T. Hebert, E. A. Hadly·bioRxiv·May 10, 2019
- Estimating home range size under spatial constraints: a comparative approach using the semi-aquatic European mink (Mustela lutreola)
Remi Bodinier, Stéphane Aulagnier, … Pascal Fournier·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2026
- Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems
N. G. Sales, M. McKenzie, … A. McDevitt·bioRxiv·May 9, 2019
- Camera trapping and passive acoustic monitoring as non-invasive techniques for the study of small mammals
Lili Stiff, Andrew Wakefield, Sean A. Rands·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2026
- Environmental DNA enables rapid detection of invasive coypu and complements camera trapping
Cyrielle Ballester, Simon Lacombe, … Olivier Giménez·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2026