Using genetics to differentiate patients with similar symptoms: application to inflammatory arthritis in the rheumatology outpatient clinic
Rachel KneveliD, Saskia le CessieiD, Chikashi C. TeraoiD, Kamil SlowikowskiiD, Jing CuiiD, Tom W. J. HuizingaiD, Karen H. CostenbaderiD, Katherine P. LiaoiD, Elizabeth W. KarlsoniD, Soumya RaychaudhuriiD
Abstract
Slow developing complex diseases are a clinical diagnostic challenge. Since genetic information is increasingly available prior to a patients first visit to a clinic, it might improve diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to devise a method to convert genetic information into simple probabilities discriminating between multiple diagnoses in patients presenting with inflammatory arthritis.\n\nWe developed G-Prob, which calculates for each patient the genetic probability for each of multiple possible diseases. We tested this for inflammatory arthritis-causing diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis and gout). After validating in simulated data, we tested G-Prob in biobank cohorts in which genetic data were linked to electronic medical records: - 1,200 patients identified by ICD-codes within the eMERGE database (n= 52,623);\n- 245 patients identified through ICD codes and review of medical records within the Partners Biobank (n=12,604);\n- 243 patients selected prospectively with final diagnoses by medical record review within the Partners Biobank (n=12,604).\nThe calibration of G-Prob with the disease status was high (with regression coefficients ranging from 0.90-1.08 (ideal would be 1.00) in all cohorts. G-Probs discriminative ability was high in all cohorts with pooled Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.69 [95%CI 0.67-0.71], 0.81 [95%CI 0.76-0.84] and 0.84 [95%CI 0.81-0.86]. For all patients, at least one disease could be ruled out, and in 45% of patients a most likely diagnosis could be identified with an overall 64% positive predictive value. In 35% of instances the clinicians initial diagnosis was incorrect. Initial clinical diagnosis explained 39% of the variance in final disease prediction which improved to 51% (P<0.0001) by adding G-Prob genetic data.\n\nIn conclusion, by converting genotypes into an interpretable probability value for five different inflammatory arthritides, we can better discriminate and diagnose rheumatic diseases. Genotypes available prior to a clinical visit could be considered part of patients medical history and potentially used to improve precision and diagnostic efficiency in clinical practice.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phenotypic signatures in clinical data enable systematic identification of patients for genetic testing
Theodore J. Morley, Lide Han, … Douglas M. Ruderfer·Nature MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2021
- Harnessing gene-gene interactions via an RNA-Sequencing network analysis framework improves precision medicine prediction in rheumatoid arthritis
Elisabetta Sciacca, Anna E. A. Surace, … Myles Lewis·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2021
- Molecular Diagnosis as a Probability of Necessity
John W. Belmont, C.J. Williams, Chad A. Shaw·medRxiv·Oct 4, 2026
- A Computational Modeling Framework to Analyze Synovial-Tissue Based Drug Targets and Diagnostic Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Paridhi Latawa, Brianna Chrisman·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2021
- Novel loci and multi-omics risk models for rheumatoid arthritis through a million-participant genome-wide association meta-analysis
Galadriel Lucia Velazquez Silva, Jelisaveta Džigurski, … Ene Reimann·medRxiv·Jun 23, 2026
- Biocomputational Analysis Establishes Genetic Association of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Migraine
Nilanjan Roy, Arpita Mazumder·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2020