BiointerphasesBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
Substrate viscoelasticity regulates fibroblast adhesion and migration
Neha PaddillayaiD, Akshar Rao, Anshul ShrivastavaiD, Imnatoshi Jamir, Kundan SenguptaiD, Namrata GundiahiD
Abstract
Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) modulate cell-substrate interactions and influence cellular behaviors such as contractility, migrations, and proliferation. Although the effects of substrate stiffness on mechanobiology have been well studied, the role of ECM viscoelasticity in fibrotic progression remains less understood. To examine how viscoelasticity affects the biophysical properties and regulates the signaling of human mammary fibroblasts, we engineered elastic (E) and viscoelastic (VE) polyacrylamide hydrogels with comparable storage moduli ([~]14.52 {+/-} 1.03 kPa) but distinctly different loss moduli. Fibroblasts cultured on E hydrogels spread extensively (2428.93 {+/-} 864.71 m{superscript 2}), developed prominent stress fibers with higher zyxin intensity, and generated higher traction stresses (2931.57 {+/-} 1732.61 Pa). In contrast, fibroblasts on VE substrates formed smaller focal adhesion areas (54.2% reduction), exhibited lower critical adhesion strengths (51.8%), and generated 21% lower traction stresses (p < 0.001), indicating weaker adhesions. These substrates also promoted migrations and showed enhanced proliferation accompanied by reduced YAP activity, suggesting a mechanotransduction shift that may involve alternative signaling pathways. In contrast, E substrates showed YAP nuclear translocation, consistent with greater cytoskeletal tension and contractility. These findings highlight the importance of energy dissipation mechanisms in regulating fibroblast function on substrates mimicking the fibrotic milieu. Our results demonstrate that tuning the ECM viscoelasticity is a useful strategy to regulate cell behaviors in tissue engineered scaffolds, and develop better disease modeling for regenerative medicine.
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The combined influence of viscoelastic and adhesive cues on fibroblast spreading and focal adhesion formation
E. Hui, L. Moretti, … S. R. Caliari·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2021
- Adenocarcinoma cell mechanobiology is altered by the loss modulus of the surrounding extracellular matrix
Ariell M. Smith, Brandon M. Pardi, … Roberto C. Andresen Eguiluz·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2026
- Matrix viscoelasticity regulates dermal fibroblast activation in a three-dimensional fibrillar microenvironment
Gianna M. Gathman, Maitri M. Patel, … Ryan S. Stowers·Cellular and Molecular BioengineeringPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2026
- Substrate Resistance to Traction Forces Controls Fibroblast Polarization
D. Missirlis, L. Heckmann, … J. Spatz·bioRxiv·May 15, 2020
- Matrix viscoelasticity controls epithelial cell mechanobiology through dimensionality
G. Ciccone, M. A. G. Oliva, … S. Gabriele·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2024
- Collagen V Presented at the Cell-Substrate Interface Mimics Substrate Stiffening to Enhance Fibroblast Traction, Adhesion Turnover, and Persistent Migration
Shaina P. Royer, Himja Tiwari, … Sangyoon J. Han·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2026