Sign in
BioinformaticsbioRxiv
Preprint

Machine intelligence design of 2019-nCoV drugs

Kaifu GaoiD, Duc Duy NguyeniD, Rui WangiD, Guo‐Wei WeiiD

Abstract

Wuhan coronavirus, called 2019-nCoV, is a newly emerged virus that infected more than 9692 people and leads to more than 213 fatalities by January 30, 2020. Currently, there is no effective treatment for this epidemic. However, the viral protease of a coronavirus is well-known to be essential for its replication and thus is an effective drug target. Fortunately, the sequence identity of the 2019-nCoV protease and that of severe-acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS-CoV) is as high as 96.1%. We show that the protease inhibitor binding sites of 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV are almost identical, which means all potential anti-SARS-CoV chemotherapies are also potential 2019-nCoV drugs. Here, we report a family of potential 2019-nCoV drugs generated by a machine intelligence-based generative network complex (GNC). The potential effectiveness of treating 2019-nCoV by using some existing HIV drugs is also analyzed.

PDFDOI
Structured summary ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC 4.0

The 2019-nCoV protease shares 96.1% sequence identity and near-identical inhibitor binding sites with SARS-CoV, so a generative machine-learning model proposes candidate inhibitors; existing HIV drugs are also assessed.

When this was posted there was no effective treatment for the newly emerged 2019-nCoV, and the viral protease, required for replication, is the standard target. The authors argue that because this protease closely matches the SARS-CoV one, anti-SARS-CoV chemotherapies carry over, and they use a generative model to propose further inhibitors.

Key results

  1. SuggestedThe protease of 2019-nCoV is close enough to the SARS-CoV protease, including at the inhibitor binding site, that the authors treat anti-SARS-CoV compounds as candidate 2019-nCoV drugs.

    Sequence identity between the two proteases is given as 96.1%; the binding sites are described as almost identical, with no structural comparison statistics reported in the abstract. · Abstract

  2. ClaimedA generative network complex produced a family of candidate 2019-nCoV protease inhibitors.

    Reported as output of a machine-intelligence generative network complex (GNC); the abstract gives no number of compounds, no predicted affinities and no experimental test. · Abstract

  3. ClaimedExisting HIV drugs are also analysed for potential effectiveness against 2019-nCoV.

    Stated as an additional analysis of existing HIV drugs; neither the drugs nor any result of that analysis appear in the abstract. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Sequence and inhibitor binding-site comparison between the 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV proteases, then generation of candidate protease inhibitors with a machine intelligence-based generative network complex (GNC). Existing HIV drugs are analysed separately for possible activity against the new virus.

  • Protease sequences of 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV, compared for identity and for inhibitor binding sites · virus
  • Existing HIV drugs assessed for possible activity against 2019-nCoV
Methods & tools
generative network complex (GNC)
Limitations (2)
  • The abstract reports no validation of the generated compounds: no count of molecules, no predicted or measured binding affinities, no docking scores and no biochemical or cell assay. · noted in this summary
  • The repurposing argument rests on protease sequence identity and a stated similarity of binding sites; no structure of the 2019-nCoV protease or evidence that anti-SARS-CoV compounds inhibit it is presented here. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you follow early computational repurposing claims for coronavirus proteases, or want a case of generative compound design argued from target homology alone.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '20Beck '20Nguyen '20Liu '20Baker '21Yamamoto '20
71% semantic matchPharmacology & Toxicology
Y. Li, J. Zhang, N. Wang+6 more·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2020