Deciphering Features of Metalloprotease Cleavage Targets Using Protein Structure Prediction
Dae Sun Chung, Jongkeun ParkiD, Won Jong Choi, Dongwan HongiD
Abstract
IntroductionADAM10 (A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 10) cleaves specific substrates, influencing diverse physiological and pathological processes. However, its substrate specificity and cleavage sites remain insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to identify and classify substrate features and elucidate cleavage sites using computational approaches. MethodsProtein structure prediction was performed on 13 substrates with experimentally defined cleavage sites to analyze ADAM10-substrate interactions and assess their structural and spatial characteristics. ResultsBased on protein structure prediction of experimentally validated substrates, we identified four recurrent structural features associated with ADAM10-mediated cleavage. First, most substrates were predicted to interact with the proteolytically active form of ADAM10 (92.3%). Second, interaction sites were typically located in the extracellular region rather than intracellular or transmembrane domains (76.9%). Third, cleavage sites predominantly resided in unstructured or extended loop regions, corresponding to linear secondary structures ([~]70%). Lastly, cleavage sites were spatially enriched in octants (1, 4, 5, and 8) relative to the catalytic Zn{superscript 2}{square} ion in the active site (84.0%). These percentages were calculated per determinant. On the basis of these determinants, we developed a classification algorithm and organized 51 substrates accordingly. As a result, 82.4% of the substrates were assigned to either Group 1 (51.0%) or Group 2 (31.4%). DiscussionThis study presents a structure-informed classification approach for predicting ADAM10 cleavage substrates, enabling candidate identification without direct experimental validation. ConclusionsWe present a novel structure-based framework for classifying the substrates of ADAM10 and demonstrate its applicability to other Metalloproteases.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Structural Basis for Selective Proteolysis of ADAM10 Substrates at Membrane-Proximal Sites
C. H. Lipper, E. D. Egan, … S. C. Blacklow·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2022
- Software-aided workflow for predicting protease-specific cleavage sites using physicochemical properties of the natural and unnatural amino acids in peptide-based drug discovery.
Tatiana Radchenko, Fabien Fontaine, … Ismael Zamora·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 8, 2019
- Comprehensive protease specificity profiling
Bo Zhu, Michael D. Lane, … Burckhard Seelig·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2024
- Deep learning guided design of protease substrates
Carmen Martin-Alonso, Sarah Alamdari, … Ava Amini·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2026
- ASAP: A Machine-Learning Framework for Local Protein Properties
Dan Ofer, Nadav Brandes, Michal Linial·DatabasePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2016
- De novo design of metalloproteases for targeted amyloid-β cleavage
Yannan Qu, Chentong Wang, … Longxing Cao·VitaPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026