Protify: A Benchmarking Platform Revealing Task Dependence and Homology Leakage in Protein Language Model Evaluation
Nikolaos RafailidisiD, Logan P HalleeiD, Tamar Peleg, Colin Horger, Luck Haviland, Jason P GleghorniD
Abstract
Protein Language Models (pLMs) have become essential tools for computational protein analysis, and the rapid proliferation of architectures, training objectives, and pretraining corpora has produced a diverse and expanding model landscape. Evaluation practices, however, remain fragmented: studies use different datasets, preprocessing pipelines, and reporting conventions, so results rarely transfer between publications. Here we introduce Protify, an open-source platform that standardizes pLM benchmarking across zero-shot, supervised, and transferlearning settings through a unified, low-code interface. Protify currently supports 35 pretrained models and 61 curated datasets and it is easy to add custom versions of each. Leveraging Protify's high throughput pipelines, we benchmarked 23 models on ProteinGym, discovering that DPLM3B is currently the top-performing self-supervised encoder. Another large-scale supervised evaluation across 32 diverse tasks, spanning enzyme classification, gene ontology annotation, protein-protein interaction, subcellular localization, and other functional properties, found that no single pLM dominated: 14 different models took the top score on at least one dataset, and the margins between the best and second-best models fell within run-to-run variability. On enzyme optimal pH prediction, a general-purpose probe pipeline matched or exceeded EpHod, a specialized model selected from 11,550 training runs, after 50 hyperparameter trials (R2 = 0.482 versus 0.425). Under a homology-controlled split of the same data, every pooled-embedding probe collapsed to near-zero R2, and only a transformer probe over full residue embeddings recovered appreciable signal (R2 = 0.248). Model rankings therefore depend as much on evaluation design as on the models themselves. Protify makes those design choices explicit, controlled, and replayable, and is freely available at https://github.com/Gleghorn-Lab/Protify.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Benchmarking Platform for Assessing Protein Language Models on Function-related Prediction Tasks
Elif Çevrim, Melih Gökay Yiğit, … Tunca Doğan·Methods in molecular biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Fine-tuning protein language models boosts predictions across diverse tasks
Robert Schmirler, Michael Heinzinger, Burkhard Rost·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 28, 2024
- PLMFit : Benchmarking Transfer Learning with Protein Language Models for Protein Engineering
Thomas Bikias, Evangelos Stamkopoulos, Sai T. Reddy·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Protein Language Models: Is Scaling Necessary?
Quentin Fournier, Robert McCoy Vernon, … CHRISTOPHER JAMES LANGMEAD·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2024
- Which pLM to choose?
Tobias Senoner, Ivan Koludarov, … Yana Bromberg·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2025
- High-resolution dissection of concept acquisition in different families of protein language models
Shawn Whitfield, Tom Marty, … Quentin Fournier·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2026