A confound-free method to manipulate pupil size in psychological experiments

Those who study visual perception and visuo-spatial attention are increasingly paying interest to the ways in which these processes are influenced by the size of the pupil. However, this realm of research is complicated by the pupils notorious susceptibility to confounders and difficulties in disentangling cause and effect. Recent studies have sought a solution in the exploitation of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which trigger pupil constrictions upon detecting blue light. Experiments typically present stimuli against blue versus red backgrounds of equal perceived luminance, to effectuate systematically smaller pupils in the former than in the latter condition. Here we provide a further validation of this method, by testing a scenario of potential concern. Via retino-hypothalamic pathways, ipRGC activation modulates alertness and arousal. Blue and red backgrounds may therefore differentially impact behavior in addition to the pupil, potentially confounding inferences about the pupils impact on cognition. This was investigated with an auditory task in which participants responded as quickly as possible to sequences of randomly timed beeps while looking at blue versus red displays. Each participant was tested with an easy and a difficult version of the auditory task. Results suggest that the ipRGC method is good to go: in the presence of effects of task difficulty on both pupil size and task performance, the display color exclusively influenced pupil size without affecting task performance.