Non-image forming vision as measured through ipRGC-mediated pupil constriction is not modulated by covert visual attention
Abstract
In brightness the pupil constricts, while in darkness the pupil dilates; this is known as the pupillary light response (PLR). The PLR is driven by all photoreceptors: rods and cones, which contribute to image-forming vision, as well as intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which contribute to non-image-forming vision. Rods and cones cause immediate pupil constriction upon light exposure, whereas ipRGCs cause sustained constriction for as long as light exposure continues. Recent studies have shown that the initial PLR is modulated by covert attention; however, it remains unclear whether the same holds for the sustained PLR. Here, we investigated the effect of covert attention on sustained, ipRGC-mediated pupil constriction. We leveraged the fact that ipRGCs are predominantly responsive to blue light, causing the most prominent sustained constriction in response to blue light. Replicating previous studies, we found that the pupil constricted more when either directly looking at, or covertly attending to, bright as compared to dim stimuli (with the same color). We also found that the pupil constricted more when directly looking at blue as compared to red stimuli (with the same luminosity); crucially, however, we did not find any difference in pupil size when covertly attending to blue as compared to red stimuli. This suggests that ipRGC-mediated pupil constriction, and possibly non-image-forming vision more generally, is not modulated by covert attention. Significance statementWhen we think of vision, we generally think of image-forming vision, that is, seeing things. However, vision can also be "non-image-forming"; for example, our day-night rhythm and pupil size are regulated by visual input, but not in a way that gives rise to conscious visual awareness. While visual attention shapes image-forming vision, its influence on non-image forming vision remains unclear. We investigated this by using ipRGCs,which contribute to non-image-forming vision and are responsive to blue light. Aside from replicating the effect of covert attention on image-forming vision, we showed that pupil constriction differed between directly looking at blue/ red stimuli, but not during covert attention to these stimuli. This suggests that non-image forming vision is not influenced by covert visual attention.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A confound-free method to manipulate pupil size in psychological experiments
Joshua Snell, Luise Wagner, Ana Vilotijević·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026
- Pupil responses to hidden photoreceptor-specific modulations in movies
Manuel Spitschan, Marina Gardasevic, … Annette E. Allen·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2019
- Pupil Constriction Causes Activity in the Human Retina and Visual System
Sebastiaan Mathôt, Olaf Dimigen, … Ana Vilotijević·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026
- Pupil size reflects the content of covertly attended afterimages
Ana Vilotijević, Sebastiaan Mathôt·bioRxiv·May 7, 2026
- Melanopsin ganglion cells in the mouse retina independently evoke pupillary light reflex
Jeremy Matthew Bohl, Abdul Rhman Hassan, … Tomomi Ichinose·Frontiers in Cellular NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2025
- Retinal circuits driving a non-image forming visual behavior
Corinne Beier, Ulisse Bocchero, … Johan Pahlberg·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2020