bioRxivCell BiologyPreprint
Development of a mouse model for postresectional liver failure.
K. M. C. van Mierlo, C. van Himbeeck, V. Lebrun, P. L. M. Jansen, C. H. C. Dejong, I. A. Leclercq, S. W. M. O. Damink, F. G. Schaap
Abstract
BackgroundPostresectional liver failure (PLF) is a dreaded complication after extended liver resection. Post-operative hyperbilirubinemia suggests that impaired hepatobiliary transport with intrahepatic accumulation of harmful cholephiles plays an etiological role. Bile salts serve dual roles as signaling molecules engaged in liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) and biological detergents. AimIn this study we tested the hypothesis that excessive accumulation of bile salts in the regenerating liver results in PLF. MethodsTwelve weeks old male C57BL6/J mice were subjected to 70% PH and post-operatively challenged with a diet supplemented with cholic acid (CA, 0.5 or 1.0%; n=5-6 per group) or a control diet. After 48 hours mice were sacrificed, and liver injury, secretory function, and regenerative indices were assessed. ResultsMice fed a 1.0% CA diet displayed more pronounced weight loss following PH and had a deranged post-operative glucose course. Liver injury (aminotransferase elevations) and impaired hepatobiliary transport function (hyperbilirubinemia) were apparent in the group fed a 1.0% CA diet, but not in animals fed a 0.5% CA diet. No differences in liver mass recovery were observed among groups. However, the percentage of hepatocytes staining positive for the proliferation marker Ki-67 were reduced in mice receiving a 1.0% CA diet relative to animals fed a 0.5% CA diet. PH-induced expression of key factors involved in cell cycle progression (e.g. Foxm1b, Cdc25b) was abrogated in the 1.0% CA group. ConclusionA postresectional challenge with a 1.0% CA diet induces signs of liver injury and defective liver regeneration. A longer duration of the dietary challenge and/or secondary hits may further improve the model. Once validated, it can be used to evaluate pharmaceutical strategies to prevent or treat PLF.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The FXR agonist obeticholic acid does not stimulate liver regeneration in hepatectomized mice.
K. M. C. van Mierlo, C. Dahrenmoller, … F. G. Schaap·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2022
- Perisurgical Colony Stimulating Factor 1 (CSF1) treatment ameliorates liver 1 ischaemia/reperfusion injury in rats
Sarah Schulze, Sahar Keshvari, … Katharine M. Irvine·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2025
- Role of HNF4alpha-cMyc Interaction in CDE-diet Induced Liver Injury and Regeneration
M. Kotulkar, J. Barbee, … U. Apte·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2023
- Circadian Clock Core Component Bmal1 Dictates Cell Cycle Rhythm of Proliferating Hepatocytes during Liver Regeneration
- A mouse model of necrotic biliary pancreatitis induced by combining gallstone formation and ligation of the biliary-pancreatic duct
Zuobiao Yuan, Junyuan Zheng, … Yue Zeng·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2017
- Regulation of Liver Regeneration by hepatocyte O-GlcNAcylation in mice
D. R. Robarts, S. R. McGreal, … U. Apte·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2021