Towards guided mutagenesis: Gaussian process regression predicts MHC class II antigen mutant binding
Abstract
Antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASI) require successful loading and presentation of antigen peptide into the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding cleft. One route of ASI design is to mutate native antigens for either stronger or weaker binding interaction to MHC. Exploring all possible mutations is costly both experimentally and computationally. To reduce experimental and computational expense, here we investigate the minimal amount of prior data required to accurately predict the relative binding affinity of point mutations for peptide-MHC class II (pMHCII) binding. Using data from different residue subsets, we interpolate pMHCII mutant binding affinities by Gaussian process (GP) regression of residue volume and hydrophobicity. We apply GP regression to an experimental dataset from the Immune Epitope Database, and theoretical datasets from NetMHCIIpan and Free Energy Perturbation calculations. We find that GP regression can predict binding affinities of 9 neutral residues from a 6-residue subset with an average R2 coefficient of determination value of 0.62 {+/-} 0.04 ({+/-}95% CI), average error of 0.09 {+/-} 0.01 kcal/mol ({+/-}95% CI), and with an ROC AUC value of 0.92 for binary classification of enhanced or diminished binding affinity. Similarly, metrics increase to an R2 value of 0.69 {+/-} 0.04, average error of 0.07 {+/-} 0.01 kcal/mol, and an ROC AUC value of 0.94 for predicting 7 neutral residues from an 8-residue subset. Our work finds that prediction is most accurate for neutral residues at anchor residue sites without register shift. This work holds relevance to predicting pMHCII binding and accelerating ASI design.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Footprints of antigen processing boost MHC class II natural ligand binding predictions
C. M. Barra, B. Alvarez, … M. Nielsen·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2018
- Predicting Peptide-MHC Binding Affinities With Imputed Training Data
Alex Rubinsteyn, Timothy O'Donnell, … Jeff Hammerbacher·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2016
- Evaluation of machine learning methods to predict peptide binding to MHC Class I proteins
Rohit Bhattacharya, Ashok Sivakumar, … Rachel Karchin·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2017
- DeepMHCII: A Novel Binding Core-Aware Deep InteractionModel for Accurate MHC II-peptide Binding Affinity Prediction
Ronghui You, Wei Qu, … Shanfeng Zhu·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2022
- High-throughput prediction of MHC Class I and Class II neoantigens with MHCnuggets
X. M. Shao, R. Bhattacharya, … R. Karchin·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2019
- Comparison of HLA ligand elution data and binding predictions reveals varying prediction performance for the multiple motifs recognized by HLA-DQ2.5
Z. Kosaloglu Yalcin, J. Sidney, … A. Sette·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2020