Increasing the resolution and precision of psychiatric GWAS by re-imputing summary statistics using a large, diverse reference panel
Chris ChatzinakosiD, Donghyung LeeiD, Na CaiiD, Vladimir I. VladimiroviD, Bradley Todd WebbiD, Brien P. RileyiD, Jonathan Flint CiD, Kenneth S. KendleriD, Kerry James RessleriD, Nikolaos P. DaskalakisiD, Silviu‐Alin BacanuiD
Abstract
Genotype imputation across populations of mixed ancestry is critical for optimal discovery in large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Methods for direct imputation of GWAS summary statistics were previously shown to be practically as accurate as summary statistics produced after raw genotype imputation, while incurring orders of magnitude lower computational burden. Given that direct imputation needs a precise estimation of linkage-disequilibrium (LD) and that most of the methods using a small reference panel e.g., ~2,500 subject coming from the 1000 Genome Project, there is a great need for much larger and more diverse reference panels. To accurately estimate the LD needed for an exhaustive analysis of any cosmopolitan cohort, we developed DISTMIX2. DISTMIX2: i) uses a much larger and more diverse reference panel and ii) estimates weights of ethnic mixture based solely on Z-scores (when AFs are not available). We applied DISTMIX2 to GWAS summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genetic Consortium (PGC). DISTMIX2 uncovered signals in numerous new regions, with most of these findings coming from the rarer variants. Rarer variants provide much sharper location for the signals compared with common variants, as the LD for rare variants extends over a lower distance than for common ones. For example, while the original PGC post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) study found only 3 marginal signals for common variants, we now uncover a very strong signal for a rare variant in PKN2, a gene associated with neuronal and hippocampal development. Thus, DISTMIX2 provides a robust and fast (re)imputation approach for most Psychiatric GWAS studies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- TWAS pathway method greatly enhances the number of leads for uncovering the molecular underpinnings of psychiatric disorders
Chris Chatzinakos, Foivos Georgiadis, … Silviu‐Alin Bacanu·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2020
- A unifying framework for summary statistic imputation
Yue Wu, Eleazar Eskin, Sriram Sankararaman·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2018
- Identifying loci with different allele frequencies among cases of eight psychiatric disorders using CC-GWAS
Wouter J. Peyrot, Alkes L. Price·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2021
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population
Jiayi Xu, Dongjing Liu, … Laura M. Huckins·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2024
- GAUSS: A comprehensive R package for accurate estimation of linkage disequilibrium for variants, Gaussian imputation and TWAS analysis of cosmopolitan cohorts
Donghyung Lee, Silviu‐Alin Bacanu·medRxiv·Sep 19, 2023
- Advantages of genotype imputation with ethnically matched reference panel for rare variant association analyses
Mart Kals, Tiit Nikopensius, … Reedik Mägi·bioRxiv·Apr 4, 2019