Differences between human and rodent nitric oxide production dictate susceptibility to tick-borne Rickettsia.

Abstract

Arthropod-borne pathogens cause serious human infections, yet they only cause limited disease in rodent reservoirs. Wild type mice resist infection by tick-borne Rickettsia parkeri, which causes spotted fever in humans, and it remains unclear why humans are vulnerable. Here, we report that whereas mouse type I interferon (IFN-I) or interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}) dramatically restrict R. parkeri in macrophages, human interferons do not. Differential RNA-seq revealed a significant induction of nitric oxide synthase 2 (Nos2, encoding inducible nitric oxide synthase, iNOS) in infected mouse but not human macrophages upon interferon treatment. Chemical iNOS inhibition or Nos2 deletion restored IFN-{gamma}-mediated restriction in mouse cells. Human cells treated with cytokine cocktails or with iNOS cofactors and substrates were still unable to restrict R. parkeri. In vivo, whereas wild type mice restricted R. parkeri, infected Nos2-/-mice developed mild skin eschars, recapitulating a key human disease manifestation. Together, our findings suggest that there is a threshold of NO production required to restrict R. parkeri, which mouse cells reach but human cells do not, and this is a key explanation for why humans develop tick-borne rickettsial diseases while rodents can be tolerant, asymptomatic reservoirs. Differences in NO abundance may provide an evolutionary explanation for human susceptibility to pathogens that propagate themselves in rodent reservoirs.