The PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis persists as a therapeutic dependency in KRASG12D-driven non-small cell lung cancer
W. J. McDaid, L. Wilson, H. Adderley, M. J. Baker, J. Searle, L. Ginn, T. Budden, M. Aldea, A. Marinello, J. Aredo, A. Viros, B. Besse, H. A. Wakelee, F. Blackhall, C. R. Lindsay, A. Malliri
Abstract
IntroductionKRASG12C and KRASG12D inhibitors represent a major translational breakthrough for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer in general by directly targeting its most mutated oncoprotein. However, resistance to these small molecules has highlighted the need for rational combination partners necessitating a critical understanding of signaling downstream of KRAS mutant isoforms. MethodsWe contrasted tumor development between KrasG12Cand KrasG12D genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). To corroborate findings and determine mutant subtype-specific dependencies, isogenic models of KrasG12C and KrasG12D initiation and adaptation were profiled by RNA sequencing. We also employed cell line models of established KRAS mutant NSCLC and determined therapeutic vulnerabilities through pharmacological inhibition. We analysed differences in survival outcomes for patients affected by advanced KRASG12C or KRASG12D-mutant NSCLC. ResultsKRASG12D exhibited higher potency in vivo, manifesting as more rapid lung tumor formation and reduced survival of KRASG12D GEMMs compared to KRASG12C. This increased potency, recapitulated in an isogenic initiation model, was associated with enhanced PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling. However, KRASG12C oncogenicity and downstream pathway activation were comparable with KRASG12D at later stages of tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo, consistent with similar clinical outcomes in patients. Despite this, established KRASG12D NSCLC models depended more on the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, while KRASG12C models on the MAPK pathway. Specifically, KRASG12D inhibition was synergistically enhanced by AKT inhibition. ConclusionsOur data highlight a unique combination treatment vulnerability and suggest that patient selection strategies for combination approaches using direct KRAS inhibitors should be i) contextualised to individual RAS mutants, and ii) tailored to their downstream signaling.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Anticancer efficacy of KRASG12C inhibitors is potentiated by PAK4 inhibitor KPT9274 in preclinical models of KRASG12C mutant pancreatic and lung cancers
H. Y. Khan, M. Nagasaka, … A. S. Azmi·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2023
- PDK1 and YAP1/TEAD signaling drive acquired KRAS inhibitor resistance in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.
Amrita Barua, Samrat T. Kundu, … Don Lynn Gibbons·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2025
- Evaluation of KRASG12C Inhibitor Responses in Novel Murine KRASG12C Lung Cancer Cell Line Models
D. J. Sisler, T. K. Hinz, … L. E. Heasley·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2022
- Inhibition of ULK1/2 and KRASG12C controls tumor growth in preclinical models of lung cancer
Phaedra C Ghazi, Kayla T O'Toole, … Martin McMahon·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2024
- CASTOR1: A Novel Tumor Suppressor Linking mTORC1 and KRAS Pathways in Tumorigenesis and Resistance to KRAS-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Xian Wang, Ling Ding, … Shou‐Jiang Gao·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2025
- Dual inhibition of GTP-bound (ON) and GDP-bound (OFF) KRASG12C suppresses PI3Kα and leads to potent tumor inhibition
Katherine Parker, Samar Ghorbanpoor, … Aaron N. Hata·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026