bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Hierarchical substrates of prediction in visual cortical spiking
Jacob Alan WesterbergiD, Yihan XiongiD, Eli SenneshiD, Hamed NejatiD, David Ricci, Mazyar Azmi, Séverine DurandiD, Ben HardcastleiD, Hannah CabascoiD, Hannah BelskiiD, Ahad BawanyiD, Ryan GillisiD, Henry LoeffleriD, Carter R. PeeneiD, Warren HaniD, Katrina NguyeniD, Vivian HaiD, Tye JohnsoniD, Conor GrassoiD, Ahrial Young, Jackie SwappiD, Ben OuelletteiD, Shiella CaldejoniD, Ali WillifordiD, Peter A. GroblewskiiD, , André M. BastosiD
Abstract
Hierarchical predictive coding (HPC) models have recently flourished in neuroscience1-9. Feedforward and feedback processing are at the heart of HPC models. Previous experimental studies using fMRI, EEG/MEG, and LFP9-11 do not reliably resolve feedback modulation from local computations and feedforward outputs. Here, using open-science8, multi-species, multi-area, high-density12, laminar neurophysiology13, we empirically test whether hierarchical predictive coding is a key component shaping cortical processing of visual stimuli. To isolate visual information processing and eliminate motor/reward confounders9-11, we use a no-report task. Our task leveraged so-called global oddballs (GO) as unpredictable, deviant stimuli that circumvent low-level adaptation. We examined their responses relative to local oddballs (LO) that we habituated into highly predictable priors. Four surprising findings in this dataset challenge many existing hierarchical predictive coding models. First, GO responses were exclusive to higher-order, more cognitive areas rather than early-to-mid visual cortex. Second, inhibitory interneuron-targeted optogenetics in primates and mice and waveform shape analysis in primates revealed no evidence that predictive suppression was implemented via these interneurons. Third, highly predictable LO responses dominated in over 50% of all neurons, including in higher-order cortex, which should have anticipated them, indicating limited evidence for predictive suppression. Lastly, prediction error responses evoked by GOs did not evoke feedforward processing. These results reveal circuit dynamics that govern how prediction shapes visual processing, motivating more neurally constrained predictive processing models.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 23
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing
André M. Bastos, Mikael Lundqvist, … Earl K. Miller·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2020
- High-level prediction errors in low-level visual cortex
David Richter, Tim Christian Kietzmann, Floris P. de Lange·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2024
- Posteromedial cortical networks encode visuomotor prediction errors.
Ryosuke F. Takeuchi, Akinori Sato, … Fumitaka Osakada·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2022
- Ubiquitous predictive processing in the spectral domain of sensory cortex
Eli Sennesh, Jacob Alan Westerberg, … André M. Bastos·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2025
- No evidence that predictions and attention modulate the first feedforward sweep of cortical information processing
Josipa Alilović, Bart Timmermans, … Heleen A. Slagter·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2019
- Dynamic Predictive Coding: A Model of Hierarchical Sequence Learning and Prediction in the Neocortex
Linxing Preston Jiang, Rajesh P. N. Rao·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2024