Designing patient-oriented combination therapies for acute myeloid leukemia based on efficacy/toxicity integration and bipartite network modeling
M. Mirzaie, E. Gholizadeh, J. J. Miettinen, T. Ruokoranta, F. Ianevski, J. Saarela, M. Manninen, S. Miettinen, C. A. Heckman, M. Jafari
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a heterogeneous and aggressive blood cancer, does not respond well to single-drug therapy. A combination of drugs is required to effectively treat this disease. Computational models are critical for combination therapy discovery due to the tens of thousands of two-drug combinations, even with approved drugs. While predicting synergistic drugs is the focus of current methods, few consider drug efficacy and potential toxicity, which are crucial for treatment success. To find effective new drug candidates, we constructed a bipartite network using patient-derived tumor samples and drugs. The network is based on drug-response screening and summarizes all treatment response heterogeneity as drug response weights. This bipartite network is then projected onto the drug part, resulting in the drug similarity network. Distinct drug clusters were identified using community detection methods, each targeting different biological processes and pathways as revealed by enrichment and pathway analysis of the drugs protein targets. Four drugs with the highest efficacy and lowest toxicity from each cluster were selected and tested for drug sensitivity using cell viability assays on various samples. Results show that the combinations of ruxolitinib-ulixertinib and sapanisertib-LY3009120 are the most effective with the least toxicity and best synergistic effects on blasts. These findings lay the foundation for personalized and successful AML therapies, ultimately leading to the development of drug combinations that can be used alongside standard first-line AML treatment. Key PointsO_LIRuxolitinib-ulixertinib and sapanisertib-LY3009120 have the best synergistic effects on AML, with the least toxicity. C_LIO_LIThis studys combinations destroy blasts without harming other healthy cells, unlike standard chemotherapy, which is less specific. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Facilitating the design of combination therapy in cancer using multipartite network models: Emphasis on acute myeloid leukemia
Mohieddin Jafari, Mehdi Mirzaie, … Jing Ping Tang·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2022
- Patient-tailored design of AML cell subpopulation-selective drug combinations
Aleksandr Ianevski, Jenni Lahtela, … Tero A. Aittokallio·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2021
- Constitutively synergistic multiagent drug formulations targeting MERTK, FLT3, and BCL-2 for treatment of AML
J. M. Kelvin, J. Jain, … E. C. Dreaden·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2023
- Synergistic and antagonistic drug interactions are prevalent but not conserved across acute myeloid leukemia cell lines
Fatma Neslihan Kalkan, Muhammed Sadik Yildiz, … Erdal Toprak·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2025
- High-throughput Approaches to Uncover Synergistic Drug Combinations in Leukemia
E. J. Chory, M. Wang, … B. Z. Stanton·SLAS DiscoveryPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2023
- Graph-based Drug Decomposition for Anticancer Response Modeling
Stefano Nasini, Luis Fernando Pérez Armas, … Meyling Hua-Chen Cheok·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2026