False facts and false views: coalescent analysis of truncated data
Abstract
Darwins dictum on false facts and false views points the way to opening the road to truth via cogent criticism of the published record. Here I discuss a case in which a truncated dataset (false facts) is used for coalescent analysis of historical demography that reaches a foregone conclusion of a bottleneck of numbers (false views).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Is most published research really false?
Jeffrey T Leek, Leah R Jager·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2016
- The fractional coalescent
S. Mashayekhi, P. Beerli·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2018
- Time-conditional properties of branches in coalescent gene trees
Alexander Platt·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2017
- The validity of the coalescent approximation for large samples
Andrew Melfi, Divakar Viswanath·Theoretical Population BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2018
- The bounded coalescent model: conditioning a genealogy on a minimum root date
J. Carson, A. Ledda, … X. Didelot·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2022
- Genealogical properties of subsamples in highly fecund populations