Taxonomic Revision and Identification Keys for the Giant Honey Bees
Abstract
The taxonomy and phylogeny of the giant honey bees (Apis; subgenus Megapis) are still controversial and unresolved. The species boundaries within the subgenus are unclear and some species that are recognized on the basis of genetic differences lack supporting morphological characters. Two species are now well accepted: Apis dorsata F. of tropical regions of Asia and Apis laboriosa Smith that inhabits the foothills of Himalaya and neighboring mountain ranges. In addition, researchers have suggested that the two allopatric populations of giant honey bees that inhabit Sulawesi, Indonesia (A. binghami Cockerell) and the oceanic Philippine islands (A. breviligula Maa) as well as the South Indian form also deserve species status. We conducted a taxonomic study based on morphological characters of Megapis from throughout Asia. Our study confirms that Apis laboriosa is a distinct species based on numerous morphological characters. Moreover, A. dorsata of mainland Asia differs from the two island taxa based on coloration, ocellus size, and the spacing of compound eyes and ocelli. We found no evidence that breviligula of the Philippines has a distinctively short tongue, and report only one minor character (the shape of sternum 5) that differed statistically between bees from Sulawesi and the Philippines. We conclude that the bees from these islands represent a single morphological species, A. binghami, with two subspecies, A. b. binghami and A. b. breviligula. Apis dorsata from the Andaman Islands are smaller than but conspecific with those of mainland Asia. We found no morphological autapomorphies in the giant honey bees of southern India known to differ in mtDNA from A. dorsata from elsewhere in mainland Asia. We provide a taxonomic keys to workers and drones within the subgenus Megapis.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phylogeography of the Giant Honeybees Based on Mitochondrial Gene Sequences
Chet Bhatta, Sarah C. Zajonz, Deborah R. Smith·Frontiers in Bee SciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2024
- Integrative taxonomy and distribution of Apis species in Malaysia
Asha Devi Pallujam, Wai-Leng Lee, … Sze Huei Yek·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2025
- The distribution of Apis laboriosa revisited: range extensions and biogeographic affinities
Gard W. Otis, Man-Juan Huang, … Kedar Devkota·Frontiers in Bee SciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2024
- Relationing of Labellum and Glossae Biomorphological characteristics of honeybee workers as breeding tool on honey collection potential of Apis mellifera L. honeybee colonies
M. A. Lashari, A. Iqbal, … A. M. Ahmed·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2021
- Development of molecular markers for western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) subspecies of regulatory concern in the United States
José Marcelino, Leigh Boardman, … Jamie D. Ellis·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2026
- Whole Genome Sequencing and Assembly of the Asian Honey Bee Apis dorsata
Sara J. Oppenheim, Xiaolong Cao, … Jeffrey Rosenfeld·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2019