Identification of Sample Processing Errors in Microbiome Studies Using Host Genetic Profiles
Julia UrbaniD, Aya Brown KaviD, William F. KindschuhiD, Heekuk ParkiD, Raiyan Rashid KhaniD, Erin WattersiD, Itsik Pe’eriD, Anne‐Catrin UhlemanniD, Tal KoremiD
Abstract
In microbiome studies, sample processing errors are frequent and difficult to detect, especially in large studies involving multiple sites, personnel, and sample types. We present two complementary approaches to identify such errors using host DNA profiled via metagenomic sequencing of microbiome samples. The first approach compares host SNPs inferred from metagenomics to independently obtained genotypes (e.g., microarray genotypes) to match samples to their donors, while the second method compares metagenomics-inferred SNPs between samples to identify samples supplied by the same donor. Furthermore, we demonstrate that combining these methods with experimental metadata provides greater confidence in the identification of errors. Analyzing a longitudinal vaginal microbiome dataset, we demonstrate the ability of our approach to identify mislabeled samples. Using subsampling, we further show that our methods are robust to low sequencing coverage. Overall, our analysis highlights the frequency of processing errors in microbiome studies. We therefore recommend applying error-detection methods in all studies with suitable data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Systematic detection of abnormal samples reveals widespread mislabeling in metagenomic studies
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes
C. S. Poulsen, C. T. Ekstrom, … S. J. Pamp·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022
- Pitfalls of genotyping microbial communities with rapidly growing genome collections
Chunyu Zhao, Zhou Jason Shi, Katherine S. Pollard·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2023
- Mitigation and detection of putative microbial contaminant reads from long-read metagenomic datasets
Stefany Ayala-Montaño, Ayorinde O. Afolayan, … Sandra Reuter·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2026
- Effects of host DNA and k-mer size on metagenomic classification of historical samples
Siu-Kin Ng, Rafal Marek Gutaker·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2025
- Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species with MetaPhlAn 4
Aitor Blanco‐Míguez, Francesco Beghini, … Nicola Segata·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2022