Effects of host DNA and k-mer size on metagenomic classification of historical samples
Abstract
Microbiome composition and function are strongly influenced by environmental factors, with major shifts driven by intensified anthropogenic pressures over the past centuries. This timeframe extends beyond the scope of experimental and longitudinal studies traditionally used to investigate microbiome dynamics. Historical samples could provide important insights into the mechanistic consequences of anthropogenic pressures and the resulting shifts in microbial diversity and composition. Despite their vast potential, historical samples held in museums and herbaria worldwide remain underutilized for exploring host-microbiome interactions across broad temporal and spatial scales, owing to their incompatibilities with standard analytical pipelines and a limited understanding of optimal analytical parameters. Host DNA removal has conventionally been considered essential for taxonomic assignment of metagenomic reads, and may be particularly important when processing degraded DNA, but it is impractical for specimens whose host species lacks a reference genome. Here, using empirical and simulation datasets, we show that host DNA content has a negligible impact on microbial data analysis. Because DNA molecules from historical samples are highly fragmented and variable in length, we further analysed the effect of k-mer size on the classification of metagenomic reads from historical samples. To improve recall rate, we propose a simple two-step approach in which reads are classified against two databases constructed with long and short k-mer sizes. Using simulated and published datasets, we demonstrated that this approach outperforms single-step workflows in recovering microbial signals from reads across a wide range of lengths. Together, our findings provide a foundation for incorporating natural history collections into host-associated microbiome research, offering insights into the long-term effects of anthropogenic change on microbial communities.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Selection of appropriate metagenome taxonomic classifiers for ancient microbiome research
I. M. Velsko, L. A. F. Frantz, … C. Warinner·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2018
- MAT-classifier: A memory-efficient pipeline for accurate genus level profiling from ancient metagenomic data
Aranya Dhibar, Mikhail V. Matz·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2026
- Disinfecting eukaryotic reference genomes to improve taxonomic inference from ancient environmental metagenomic data
Nikolay Oskolkov, Chenyu Jin, … Tom van der Valk·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2025
- Large-scale estimation of bacterial and archaeal DNA prevalence in metagenomes reveals biome-specific patterns
Raphael Eisenhofer, Antton Alberdi, Ben J. Woodcroft·mSystemsPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2026
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes
C. S. Poulsen, C. T. Ekstrom, … S. J. Pamp·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022
- Pangenome databases provide superior host removal and mycobacteria classification from clinical metagenomic data
Michael B. Hall, Lachlan Coin·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024