Detecting Random Mutations in 16S rRNA Sequences
Abstract
Motivation: High-throughput sequencing technologies have driven rapid growth of biological sequence databases. Public repositories must therefore rely on automated computational heuristics to screen submitted sequences for errors and low quality. For example, SILVA SSU Ref, which exploits the conserved nature of 16S and 18S rRNA sequences, applies strict algorithmic quality controls yet still accepts sequences with up to 30% of their nucleotides deviating from any previously accepted sequence. This permissiveness creates opportunities for the admission of modified sequences, such as biologically plausible sequences generated by DNA foundation models. The vulnerability of public sequence databases to becoming polluted or poisoned with modified sequences necessitates the development of methods to detect such sequences. Results: We present the first investigation, to our knowledge, of the detectability of modified sequences. We consider simple computationally-modified 16S rRNA sequences that pass the quality control inclusion criteria of the SILVA database, which we generate via random substitutions. We present classifiers that can distinguish such modified sequences from natural 16S rRNA using conserved motifs. Our best classifier achieves over 90% sensitivity and specificity on our testing set when using a 5% artificial mutation rate. One feature used in our classifiers, gapped k-mers constructed from universally conserved nucleotides, was conserved across all three domains of life despite relying on exact matches to patterns found in E. coli, advancing our understanding of conserved grammatical structure in small subunit rRNA sequences. Availability and Implementation: Our source code is available at https://github.com/rainhaworth/16S-Mutation-Classifiers.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- HashSeq: A Simple, Scalable, and Conservative De Novo Variant Caller for 16S rRNA Gene Datasets
Farnaz Fouladi, Jacqueline B. Young, Anthony A. Fodor·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2021
- MRT-ModSeq - Rapid detection of RNA modifications with MarathonRT
R. d. C. Araujo Tavares, G. Mahadeshwar, … A. M. Pyle·bioRxiv·May 25, 2023
- A deep learning model embedded framework to distinguish DNA and RNA mutations directly from RNA-seq
Zhi-Can Fu, Bao‐Qing Gao, … Li Chun Yang·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2023
- Reading canonical and modified nucleotides in 16S ribosomal RNA using nanopore direct RNA sequencing
Andrew M. Smith, Miten Jain, … Mark Akeson·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2017
- Mining underutilized whole-genome sequencing projects to improve 16S rRNA databases
Ben Nolan, Florence Abram, … Nicholas R. Waters·bioRxiv·Jan 1, 2021
- Benchmarking Tools for Identification of rRNA Modifications in Escherichia coli using Oxford Nanopore Direct RNA Sequencing
Bhargava Reddy Morampalli, Olin Silander·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2026