bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
3D bone printing via primed differentiation of stem cells with ultrasound (3DBonUS)
Martina MarcotulliiD, Chiara Patuto, Chiara ScognamiglioiD, Federico SerpeiD, Lucia IafrateiD, Efsun ŞentürkiD, Sara B. KelleriD, Davide De GrandiiD, Biagio PalmisanoiD, Alessandro CorsiiD, Mara RiminucciiD, Giancarlo RuoccoiD, Dario CarugoiD, Gianluca CidonioiD
Abstract
Bone disorders and skeletal defects represent a significant clinical challenge. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) strategies using 3D bioprinting have emerged as promising alternatives, but still limited by the inability of directing stem cell differentiation in a controlled and reproducible manner. Advancing beyond this, we are proposing 3D bone printing via primed differentiation of stem cells with ultrasound (referred to here as 3DBonUS). This approach synergistically integrates low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) with a microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting platform enabling the biophysical stimulation of human bone marrow stromal cells (HBMSCs) during extrusion, promoting osteogenic differentiation without the need for post-fabrication treatments. Moreover, the incorporation of microbubbles enhanced the effects of LIPUS by amplifying mechanical signals at the cellular level. 3DBonUS was found to significantly upregulate key osteogenic markers (RUNX-2, ALP, COL1A1, BMP-2, OCN, OPN) as confirmed by immunofluorescence and RT-qPCR analysis. Furthermore, the LIPUS-treated constructs showed a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition, indicating enhanced mineralisation. The 3DBonUS strategy represents a new modality in skeletal biofabrication, harnessing targeted minimally-invasive mechanical stimulation, with potential for manufacturing scalability and clinical application. Future studies will aim to validate 3DBonUS in vivo to assess the ultimate regenerative potential with enhanced osteogenic properties.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Towards 3D-bioprinting of osseous tissue of pre-defined shape using single-matrix cell-bioink constructs
Y. Gu, S. Pigeot, … P. Shastri·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2022
- Integration of In-Line Light-Mediated Cell Activation in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting: A New Biofabrication Strategy for Bone Tissue Engineering
Sophie C. Doettl, Andrea Malandrino, … Eleni Priglinger·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2026
- 3D bioprinting of co-cultured osteogenic spheroids for bone tissue fabrication
D. Heo, B. Ayan, … I. T. Ozbolat·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2020
- Tomographic Volumetric Bioprinting of Heterocellular Bone-like Tissues in Seconds
- Volumetric Bioprinting of Bone-like Mineralizing Hydrogel Constructs in the Presence of High Cell Densities and Mineral Precursors
Bregje W.M. de Wildt, Margherita Bernero, … Xiao‐Hua Qin·BiofabricationPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2026
- Implantable electrical stimulation bioreactor with liquid crystal polymer based electrodes for enhanced bone regeneration at mandibular large defects in rabbit
C. Kim, H. J. Yang, … S. J. Hwang·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2019