henhaobio
Sign in

Genome biologyMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Positional motif analysis reveals the extent of specificity of protein-RNA interactions observed by CLIP

Klara KuretiD, Aram Gustav AmaliettiiD, D. Marc JonesiD, Charlotte CapitanchikiD, Jernej UleiD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

BackgroundCrosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is a method used to identify in vivo RNA- protein binding sites on a transcriptome-wide scale. With the increasing amounts of available data for RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), it is important to understand to what degree the enriched motifs specify the RNA binding profiles of RBPs in cells. ResultsWe develop positionally-enriched k-mer analysis (PEKA), a computational tool for efficient analysis of enriched motifs from individual CLIP datasets, which minimises the impact of technical and regional genomic biases by internal data normalisation. We cross-validate PEKA with mCross, and show that background correction by size-matched input doesnt generally improve the specificity of detected motifs. We identify motif classes with common enrichment patterns across eCLIP datasets and across RNA regions, while also observing variations in the specificity and the extent of motif enrichment across eCLIP datasets, between variant CLIP protocols, and between CLIP and in vitro binding data. Thereby we gain insights into the contributions of technical and regional genomic biases to the enriched motifs, and find how motif enrichment features relate to the domain composition and low-complexity regions (LCRs) of the studied proteins. ConclusionsOur study provides insights into the overall contributions of regional binding preferences, protein domains and LCRs to the specificity of protein-RNA interactions, and shows the value of cross-motif and cross-RBP comparison for data interpretation. Our results are presented for exploratory analysis via an online platform in an RBP-centric and motif-centric manner (https://imaps.goodwright.com/apps/peka/). PEKA is available from https://github.com/ulelab/peka.

Citations
50
FWCI
3.75
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKatsantoni '23Chakrabarti '17Orenstein '16Schwarzl '23Feng '19Lee '21
74% semantic matchBioinformatics
Maria Katsantoni, Erik van Nimwegen, Mihaela Zavolan·Genome biology·Apr 17, 2023· 12 citations