bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Resolution-standardized evaluation of ligand atomic coordinates in crystallographic structures using machine learning
Ikuko MiyaguchiiD, Hiroaki HataiD, Takaaki Kuribayashi, Shota Takahashi, Akiko Kashima, Kouta Murasaki, Shigeyuki MatsumotoiD, Kei TerayamaiD, Masateru OhtaiD, Mitsunori IkeguchiiD
Abstract
Accurate assessment of ligand coordinate-density consistency across different resolutions remains challenging in macromolecular crystallography. We introduce the atomic Box Correlation Coefficient (aBCC), an atom-level metric for evaluating the consistency between ligand atomic coordinates and electron density in a resolution-standardized framework. To predict aBCC values from electron-density maps, we developed QAEmap, a machine-learning model based on three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (3D-CNNs). The model was trained using Fourier-truncated electron-density maps and corresponding ligand coordinates generated from high-resolution structures in the Protein Data Bank. It was evaluated using both Fourier-truncated electron-density maps and experimentally determined PDB structures. was evaluated using both Fourier-truncated electron-density maps and experimentally determined PDB structures.The prediction accuracy gradually decreased with decreasing resolution, but remained reliable up to [~]3.5 [A]. These results demonstrate that aBCC enables resolution-standardized atom-wise evaluation of coordinate-density consistency across different resolutions and provide a foundation for further development and refinement of machine learning-based coordinate validation. SynopsisWe introduce the atomic box correlation coefficient (aBCC), a machine learning-based metric for the resolution-standardized atom-level evaluation of ligand coordinate-density consistency in crystallographic structures. aBCC provides a common framework for assessing and communicating the local coordinate reliability between structural biologists and researchers in structure-based drug discovery.
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessing PDB Macromolecular Crystal Structure Confidence at the Individual Amino Acid Residue Level
C. Shao, S. K. Burley, S. Wang·bioRxiv·May 17, 2022
- One particle per residue is sufficient to describe all-atom protein structures
- Automatic and accurate ligand structure determination guided by cryo-electron microscopy maps
- Cascaded-CNN: Deep Learning to Predict Protein Backbone Structure from High-Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps
Dong Si, Spencer A. Moritz, … Jianlin Jack Cheng·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2020
- Q-score as a reliability measure for protein, nucleic acid, and small molecule atomic coordinate models derived from 3DEM density maps
Grigore D Pintilie, Chenghua Shao, … Wah Chiu·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 4, 2025
- AQuaRef: Machine learning accelerated quantum refinement of protein structures
R.I. Zubatyuk, Małgorzata Biczysko, … Pavel V. Afonine·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2025