The order, but not the structure, of cross-domain learning influences memory consolidation
Ainsley Temudo, Owen Benzley, Bradley R. KingiD, Geneviève AlbouyiD
Abstract
Everyday activities often require learning sequences that necessitate the involvement of both the declarative and the procedural memory domains. Previous research has shown that a learning structure that is common across tasks from different domains can improve learning and resistance to interference. However, it remains unknown whether such shared learning structure can enhance longer-term memory retention. To address this question, forty-eight healthy adults participated in a pre-registered study in which they learned both an object sequence task (declarative learning) and a motor sequence task (procedural learning) in two separate sessions separated by 4h. Participants were assigned to either an associated group, where the two tasks shared a common learning structure - that consisted of a specific mapping between finger movements and object categories across learning sessions - or an unassociated group with no such cross-domain shared structure. Memory retention was assessed with a 24h retest session on both tasks. Contrary to our predictions, a shared higher-order structure between tasks from different domains did not enhance memory retention. Exploratory follow-up analyses revealed that the order the tasks were learned (i.e., object or motor first), rather than their structural overlap, influenced performance. Specifically, learning the motor task before the object task impaired the consolidation of the object task irrespective of whether the tasks shared a common learning structure or not. This effect was unidirectional as learning the object task before the motor task had no effect on the consolidation of the motor task. Altogether, the current findings suggest that the order of cross-domain learning experiences rather than their structure influences memory consolidation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Investigating cross-memory interactions of timing structures
Sophie Thong, Joshua J. Hendrikse, … James P. Coxon·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2026
- Generalisation between motor and declarative memory sequences: A conceptual replication of Mosha & Robertson (2016)
Sophie Thong, Joshua J. Hendrikse, … James P. Coxon·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2026
- REACTIVATION PROTECTS MOTOR MEMORIES FROM INTERFERENCE BY COMPETING LEARNING
T. Suresh, Adarsh M Kumar, Pratik K. Mutha·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2025
- Implicitly Learned Higher Order Associations Differentiates Recent and Remote Retrieval of Temporal Order Memory
S. Shridhar, V. P. Singh, … J. Balaji·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2021
- Musical training improves planning and robustness of sequence learning
Li‐Ann Leow, Jarrad A. G. Lum, … Welber Marinovic·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2026
- Impact of Training Regimes and Task Similarity on Learning and Cognitive Transfer
Nicholas Menghi, Simone Viganò, … Christian F. Doeller·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2025